link
very good analysis
another one (same author):
link
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
analysis of AP relating matrydom
link
good read on the spin that happens all the time - and the lazy minded will never read/notice/process
good read on the spin that happens all the time - and the lazy minded will never read/notice/process
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land
link
This is a great doco on media treatment of Palestine, Israel, etc
Note: over an hour long but well worth it. I'll try to get a counterpoint video if possible. One that shows, perhaps, how the Israelis are disadvantaged by the media ;)
This is a great doco on media treatment of Palestine, Israel, etc
Note: over an hour long but well worth it. I'll try to get a counterpoint video if possible. One that shows, perhaps, how the Israelis are disadvantaged by the media ;)
roadblocks and checkpoints in the West Bank
hi
roadblock
Should be able to enlarge by clicking on the image. Take 5 minutes and look and the way the roads are blocked (I counted close to 90 roadblocks). There is a map of West Bank water control which is also quite illuminating - will try and post. For those who don't know - west bank and gaza are "occupied" territory. Palestinian territory, occupied by Israel
roadblock
Should be able to enlarge by clicking on the image. Take 5 minutes and look and the way the roads are blocked (I counted close to 90 roadblocks). There is a map of West Bank water control which is also quite illuminating - will try and post. For those who don't know - west bank and gaza are "occupied" territory. Palestinian territory, occupied by Israel
Monday, December 22, 2008
the future is not secret
future
For those who are unaware of the palestinian plight - please examine the transitional map carefully
For those who are unaware of the palestinian plight - please examine the transitional map carefully
Tuesday, December 09, 2008
Monday, December 08, 2008
Monday, November 24, 2008
good articlew on fed manipulation, kennedy and issue of money
ohn F. Kennedy vs The Federal Reserve
John P. Curran
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.
“United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
xoxox
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO... 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO... 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO... 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO... 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO... 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.
The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors".
The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:
"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)". The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".
Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".
Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,
Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."
In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne xoxox
What is the Federal Reserve Bank?
What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?
by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999
The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.
There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."
Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.
In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.
Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.
Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.
This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.
The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.
The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.
Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.
Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.
The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles.
Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we?
Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?
Do you think they will do it again?
Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses.
Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?
Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?
Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.
Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.
This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.
The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.
In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.
Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.
Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.
Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.
The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example.
Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.
Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.
It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.
Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.
So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.
If "We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.
Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.
Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?" "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."
John P. Curran
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.
“United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
xoxox
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO... 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO... 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO... 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO... 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO... 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.
The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors".
The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:
"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)". The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".
Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".
Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,
Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this plight."
In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne xoxox
What is the Federal Reserve Bank?
What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?
by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999
The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.
There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."
Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.
In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.
Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.
Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.
This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.
The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.
The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.
Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.
Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.
The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles.
Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we?
Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?
Do you think they will do it again?
Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that? The market collapses.
Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?
Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?
Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.
Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.
This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.
The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new central bank had been created.
In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.
Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that money.
Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.
Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.
The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's use another example.
Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply a computer entry.
Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed by the FED.
It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.
Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.
So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.
If "We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.
Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.
Ask your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?" "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Monday, October 20, 2008
cuba - oil reserves
LONDON (MarketWatch) -- Cuba's oil reserves may be substantially larger than originally estimated, according to reports. Cuban energy officials have said that the country may have over 20 billion barrels of recoverable oil in its offshore fields in the Gulf of Mexico. If confirmed, such reserves would put Cuba among the world's top 20 oil-producing nations.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
update from Ron Paul on the bailout
ron paul on the bailout
"Besides, economically, it's a disaster. This is going to cause a great deal of harm. It's like a drug addict taking a strong fix, and he feels better for a day or two, but believe me, we're going to kill the patient. And the patient here is the dollar system and our entire world economy. I would say let's get off this addiction."
"Besides, economically, it's a disaster. This is going to cause a great deal of harm. It's like a drug addict taking a strong fix, and he feels better for a day or two, but believe me, we're going to kill the patient. And the patient here is the dollar system and our entire world economy. I would say let's get off this addiction."
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Friday, September 26, 2008
Trigger points, Janet Travell and JFK
presidents physician
more
who is Janet Travell?
janet
what is a trigger point?
tp
why do you care?
well.....
because *everyone* experiences pain
more
who is Janet Travell?
janet
what is a trigger point?
tp
why do you care?
well.....
because *everyone* experiences pain
Sunday, September 07, 2008
Friday, September 05, 2008
satanists in South Africa
recently South Africa has been rocked by two criminals - one a serial rapist, Tsediso Letsoenya and the other, a schoolboy, murdering people with a sword. reading these stories - what struck me is that satanism emerged in both. Have a read...
The father and daughter story ends with just a scare - so if you feel hesitant to read - know that the outcome was not too tragic. Notice how he says he is working for a satanist. Also note the severe crime against nature that was attempted
Most people rationalise satanism away and perhaps it is used as an excuse; but let us ignore it at our own peril - afterall the NW0 is allegedly a satanic organisation.
serial
sword
satanism in SA
The father and daughter story ends with just a scare - so if you feel hesitant to read - know that the outcome was not too tragic. Notice how he says he is working for a satanist. Also note the severe crime against nature that was attempted
Most people rationalise satanism away and perhaps it is used as an excuse; but let us ignore it at our own peril - afterall the NW0 is allegedly a satanic organisation.
serial
sword
satanism in SA
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Monday, August 25, 2008
excellent explanation of quantum strangeness - the double slit experiment
You may have heard of this - this was when the quantum physicists heads were officially exploded - have a look
clip from whatthebleep
Furthermore - animation is clearly the great, untapped education tool - no?
clip from whatthebleep
Furthermore - animation is clearly the great, untapped education tool - no?
Monday, August 18, 2008
Friday, August 15, 2008
Georgia - precis by Icke
GEORGIA IS JUST ANOTHER MOVE
It’s all smoke a mirrors and while the Georgia attacks on South Ossetia are being seen as a disaster for the Georgian people because of the Russian response, and a disaster for America and its ambitions around the Caspian Sea, there is another way to look at this.
Firstly, it doesn’t matter to the forces that control Brzezinski and Soros if what they do makes the Georgian people suffer. That doesn’t register with them when they are planning their dastardly deeds. It’s simply not a factor that’s ever considered.
And second, if you look beyond ‘America’ to the forces that control America and Russia and China and the European Union and Israel it has all worked out rather well. They have now triggered more hostility, unrest, fear and mistrust in this, to them, crucial part of the world. In short, they have divided and ruled yet again.
They also have American troops in Georgia for ‘humanitarian’ reasons in the wake of the conflict and this is another step towards the Third World War that all this global manoeuvring is eventually leading to – the war to destroy America as a ‘superpower’ and bring in the World government dictatorship.
Brzezinski’s stated plan for Eurasia and the Caspian Sea region is only one level of the game as it relates to the United States. At higher levels, indeed to Brzezinski in private, the United States is nothing more than another pawn to be played off against Russia, China, Iran and whoever else, to install the goal of a world fascist tyranny.
The ultimate force of control and manipulation is not even on this planet or in this reality, so no matter what level the game is played in the ‘physical world’ it is still not the top of the pyramid and thus does not have the full picture.
What we see in this ‘world’ in terms of manipulators and manipulated are only different levels of pawns manipulating other pawns to advance the will of the other-dimensional kings and queens that most of them don’t even know exist.
It’s all smoke a mirrors and while the Georgia attacks on South Ossetia are being seen as a disaster for the Georgian people because of the Russian response, and a disaster for America and its ambitions around the Caspian Sea, there is another way to look at this.
Firstly, it doesn’t matter to the forces that control Brzezinski and Soros if what they do makes the Georgian people suffer. That doesn’t register with them when they are planning their dastardly deeds. It’s simply not a factor that’s ever considered.
And second, if you look beyond ‘America’ to the forces that control America and Russia and China and the European Union and Israel it has all worked out rather well. They have now triggered more hostility, unrest, fear and mistrust in this, to them, crucial part of the world. In short, they have divided and ruled yet again.
They also have American troops in Georgia for ‘humanitarian’ reasons in the wake of the conflict and this is another step towards the Third World War that all this global manoeuvring is eventually leading to – the war to destroy America as a ‘superpower’ and bring in the World government dictatorship.
Brzezinski’s stated plan for Eurasia and the Caspian Sea region is only one level of the game as it relates to the United States. At higher levels, indeed to Brzezinski in private, the United States is nothing more than another pawn to be played off against Russia, China, Iran and whoever else, to install the goal of a world fascist tyranny.
The ultimate force of control and manipulation is not even on this planet or in this reality, so no matter what level the game is played in the ‘physical world’ it is still not the top of the pyramid and thus does not have the full picture.
What we see in this ‘world’ in terms of manipulators and manipulated are only different levels of pawns manipulating other pawns to advance the will of the other-dimensional kings and queens that most of them don’t even know exist.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
Muscular Electricity - this day in 1942
The electrical charge on a single muscle cell has been precisely measured for the first time, announced Dr. Ralph Gerard of the University of Chicago last week. Using needle-fine microelectrodes on 3/1,000-inch cells from frog muscles, he detected charges of 6/100ths of a volt. This surprisingly large potential is lost when the muscle moves. Thus, said Gerard, stimulation of a muscle consists in momentarily short-circuiting its electrical balance.
Thursday, August 07, 2008
Friday, August 01, 2008
Albert Pike and the prediction of 3 World wars
Whilst we're on prophesies and predictions....
Albert Pike was a giant of 19 century masonry, military and diplomacy. He wrote the masons handbook "Morals and Dogmas" where he describes the levels and mythology for learned masons. There are also unsubstantiated rumours that he created the Ku Klux Klan (long article but worth it!.
He also more intriguingly is referenced by Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile in Mysteries of Freemasonry Explained, written in 1925, specifically relating to a letter he claims to have viewed between Pike and Guiseppe Mazzini , who was important in the unification of Italy (with Giuseppe Garibaldi). Pike has apparently been inspired by a vision/spiritual adviser.
The letter was allegedly written in 1871, from Pike to Mazzini. The important part is pasted below:
The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the 'agentur' (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.
The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.
We shall unleash the Nihilists and the Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute Atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now: if this was written in 1871, its a remarkable prediction. However, as usual, the letter is claimed to have never existed/forgery/fake/hoax. (sound familiar??)
From Wikipedia:
"Now this letter is at least as old as 1896 (if it a forgery); if it is genuine, it is as old as 1871. It must therefore be considered remarkable, whether as a forgery or as a genuine document. For it predicts what has happened in Russia, and it claims for its authors that they were preparing to bring about what has happened."
However, it is certainly referenced in 1925 - there is no historical doubt about that. So, depending on your world view, the statement was either made in 1871, 1896 or latest 1925 - either way, again, its an astounding prediction of what has been occurring.
.....Or is it a blueprint???
Your comments appreciated
SVS
Albert Pike was a giant of 19 century masonry, military and diplomacy. He wrote the masons handbook "Morals and Dogmas" where he describes the levels and mythology for learned masons. There are also unsubstantiated rumours that he created the Ku Klux Klan (long article but worth it!.
He also more intriguingly is referenced by Cardinal Caro y Rodriguez of Santiago, Chile in Mysteries of Freemasonry Explained, written in 1925, specifically relating to a letter he claims to have viewed between Pike and Guiseppe Mazzini , who was important in the unification of Italy (with Giuseppe Garibaldi). Pike has apparently been inspired by a vision/spiritual adviser.
The letter was allegedly written in 1871, from Pike to Mazzini. The important part is pasted below:
The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the 'agentur' (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.
The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the 'agentur' of the 'Illuminati' between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion.
We shall unleash the Nihilists and the Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute Atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now: if this was written in 1871, its a remarkable prediction. However, as usual, the letter is claimed to have never existed/forgery/fake/hoax. (sound familiar??)
From Wikipedia:
"Now this letter is at least as old as 1896 (if it a forgery); if it is genuine, it is as old as 1871. It must therefore be considered remarkable, whether as a forgery or as a genuine document. For it predicts what has happened in Russia, and it claims for its authors that they were preparing to bring about what has happened."
However, it is certainly referenced in 1925 - there is no historical doubt about that. So, depending on your world view, the statement was either made in 1871, 1896 or latest 1925 - either way, again, its an astounding prediction of what has been occurring.
.....Or is it a blueprint???
Your comments appreciated
SVS
Thursday, July 31, 2008
the protocols of zion
Dear goyim,
If you haven't read the protocols, have a look here. These surfaced circa. early 1900's - I would advise that the "Jews did it" angle is a smokescreen - its really a NWO blueprint.
The Jewish people are, of course used, like every other nation is used, in the march toward fascism/complete control. The Rothschild family practically built (info from a pro zionist site)the state of Israel. (Notice how they try to keep their name hidden!). I believe they want the state of Israel for:
1. the spiritual significance of Jerusalem. Remember this movement is 1st and foremost occult and superstitious - the prophecy - when Solomon's temple is rebuilt in Jerusalem, christ/anti christ will appear. Temple Mount is currently Muslim/Palestinian territory
2. A "legitimate" state that can have (and does have) a superb army and airforce (2nd only to US and UK in number of F16's)and of course, the coup de grace - nuclear weapons (4th in the nuclear race). A corporation/family could never wield this type of power without using a state's privileges
3. fomenting tensions in the 21st century's "tinder box", the middle east - at the outbreak of WW1 the Balkans (Serbia, et. al.) was the "tinder box of Europe" which got sparked by an assassination performed by....a secret society. A 3rd world war is certainly on some ppls minds. Certainly features in many prophesies...
4. The power of the holocaust and the concept of "antisemitism". I once chatted to an older historian friend of mine about the pending genocide in Palestine - he acknowledged it but then stated that his generation (about 50 years old) grant Israel leeway owing to the Holocaust - oh, the tragedy of Palestine!
Anyways - back to the protocols - they surfaced in the early 1900's - used by the Czar as evidence for pogroms. Hitler received them and they became, allegedly, de facto evidence cited in Mein Kampf, for his pogroms.
Scholars have largely dismissed them as being 'ripped' from a play altho Makow believes that link is tenuous.
So I invite, you the reader to consider this document, even just as a historical artifact - Although in this perspective - where you see "us", "we" - think NWO in whatever guise, ...and behold one of the most prophetic political manifesto's we have yet seen.
Lastly - its important to see the 'noise' around this document - hence you may not have seen/heard of them before - they are labeled as "dangerously" anti-Semitic. This is interesting, as I believe they were leaked by accident and that this is damage control.
regards
If you haven't read the protocols, have a look here. These surfaced circa. early 1900's - I would advise that the "Jews did it" angle is a smokescreen - its really a NWO blueprint.
The Jewish people are, of course used, like every other nation is used, in the march toward fascism/complete control. The Rothschild family practically built (info from a pro zionist site)the state of Israel. (Notice how they try to keep their name hidden!). I believe they want the state of Israel for:
1. the spiritual significance of Jerusalem. Remember this movement is 1st and foremost occult and superstitious - the prophecy - when Solomon's temple is rebuilt in Jerusalem, christ/anti christ will appear. Temple Mount is currently Muslim/Palestinian territory
2. A "legitimate" state that can have (and does have) a superb army and airforce (2nd only to US and UK in number of F16's)and of course, the coup de grace - nuclear weapons (4th in the nuclear race). A corporation/family could never wield this type of power without using a state's privileges
3. fomenting tensions in the 21st century's "tinder box", the middle east - at the outbreak of WW1 the Balkans (Serbia, et. al.) was the "tinder box of Europe" which got sparked by an assassination performed by....a secret society. A 3rd world war is certainly on some ppls minds. Certainly features in many prophesies...
4. The power of the holocaust and the concept of "antisemitism". I once chatted to an older historian friend of mine about the pending genocide in Palestine - he acknowledged it but then stated that his generation (about 50 years old) grant Israel leeway owing to the Holocaust - oh, the tragedy of Palestine!
Anyways - back to the protocols - they surfaced in the early 1900's - used by the Czar as evidence for pogroms. Hitler received them and they became, allegedly, de facto evidence cited in Mein Kampf, for his pogroms.
Scholars have largely dismissed them as being 'ripped' from a play altho Makow believes that link is tenuous.
So I invite, you the reader to consider this document, even just as a historical artifact - Although in this perspective - where you see "us", "we" - think NWO in whatever guise, ...and behold one of the most prophetic political manifesto's we have yet seen.
Lastly - its important to see the 'noise' around this document - hence you may not have seen/heard of them before - they are labeled as "dangerously" anti-Semitic. This is interesting, as I believe they were leaked by accident and that this is damage control.
regards
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
amalgam debate
PRO
link
middle
link
Con
link
link
I believe amalgam is a very serious health risk. Mercury is a poison - poisons have in my opinion a characteristic of not being able to be 'passed' efficiently by the body as well as being toxic. So it stays and pollutes. Now: with amalgam, one thing that is clear from all points of view (pro, con), is that tiny amounts of mercury are whittled off the filling each day - based on this and the mercury 'poison factor' above, this means that the body's mercury stores will increase over time - which inhibits the immune system (the body's resources are diverted to mercury management), and can result, on a mild level, in fatigue, retarded muscular repair, etc; and in more extreme cases (more mercury, and/or more sensitive body system), symptoms that tend toward more acute mercury poisoning.
Now: couple this with the mercury 'boost' received from a thiomersal vaccination, and it can be disastrous.
On this note - please bear in mind- when looked at in isolation, all be the effects visible and real, these effects may seem benign and relatively harmless, but we live in a "AND" world not an "OR" world - i.e. we have multiple compounding factors..
AND LASTLY: mankind relies too much on 'studies' and 'experts' - this is a distortion and can be manipulated as we have seen many times. It also dis-empowers us. Reality is simple - the more this is seen, the more it is realised. We should take the responsibility back and think these things through with basic knowledge and reasoning - yes, I accept a study that says mercury is a poison (this can be very simply proven by anyone at home with a broken thermometer and a mouse), I accept a study that says mercury is released in tiny amounts (sure, you may need a strong magnifier and sensitive urine test, but this is still very quantifiable) - but from there we MUST use deductive reasoning to decide whether this is a benign or dangerous or otherwise. We must use deductive reasoning to think about the difference between mercury and say, rotten food - both can kill, but one is 'passed' quite well, the other not. To read a study on "autism" causes, is like looking at an old man in order to understand fertilisation. Too many other factors - too much confusion - too much scope for obfuscation
Nuff said.
SVS
link
middle
link
Con
link
link
I believe amalgam is a very serious health risk. Mercury is a poison - poisons have in my opinion a characteristic of not being able to be 'passed' efficiently by the body as well as being toxic. So it stays and pollutes. Now: with amalgam, one thing that is clear from all points of view (pro, con), is that tiny amounts of mercury are whittled off the filling each day - based on this and the mercury 'poison factor' above, this means that the body's mercury stores will increase over time - which inhibits the immune system (the body's resources are diverted to mercury management), and can result, on a mild level, in fatigue, retarded muscular repair, etc; and in more extreme cases (more mercury, and/or more sensitive body system), symptoms that tend toward more acute mercury poisoning.
Now: couple this with the mercury 'boost' received from a thiomersal vaccination, and it can be disastrous.
On this note - please bear in mind- when looked at in isolation, all be the effects visible and real, these effects may seem benign and relatively harmless, but we live in a "AND" world not an "OR" world - i.e. we have multiple compounding factors..
AND LASTLY: mankind relies too much on 'studies' and 'experts' - this is a distortion and can be manipulated as we have seen many times. It also dis-empowers us. Reality is simple - the more this is seen, the more it is realised. We should take the responsibility back and think these things through with basic knowledge and reasoning - yes, I accept a study that says mercury is a poison (this can be very simply proven by anyone at home with a broken thermometer and a mouse), I accept a study that says mercury is released in tiny amounts (sure, you may need a strong magnifier and sensitive urine test, but this is still very quantifiable) - but from there we MUST use deductive reasoning to decide whether this is a benign or dangerous or otherwise. We must use deductive reasoning to think about the difference between mercury and say, rotten food - both can kill, but one is 'passed' quite well, the other not. To read a study on "autism" causes, is like looking at an old man in order to understand fertilisation. Too many other factors - too much confusion - too much scope for obfuscation
Nuff said.
SVS
Friday, July 25, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Thursday, July 10, 2008
weather manipulation, orgonite
I got the following from Harsa in Czech Republic. The questions and comments are quite thoughtful and I hope will generate some useful general discussion. I'll add my own comments after his notes:
Hallo Don,
This is Harsa from Czech again. Thank you very much for your encouraging answer concerning CBs.
My work is going on fine, lately, I had a nice confirmation of blue sky after having gifted a nuke (that I was said had already been gifted before, maybe not sufficiently).
There is another problem that intrigues me now. I can see over my head that the skies are very unhealthy, always full of differnt forms of artificial clouds, sometimes mixed with natural ones. There are only short periods of normal skies when they stop their activities (to work elsewhere for a while) - then all the chemtrails and manmade clouds are dissolved rather quickly by the CB.
I was trying to compare what I see with my eyes and in satellite/radar images. I find that chemtrails and artificial clouds can be seen there quite easily. They have differnt colors and they behave in a different way than natural clouds. I became specially intrigued by very white clouds that start suddelnly from some point and spread rapidly in a circle (like shaving foam) over a large area - p.e. yesterday afternoon, such a cloud covered all Hungary in a few hours (it even had two hurricanlike eyes...). These clouds are surely meant to intensify rain, wind and thundrstorms. - My question was how and from where they can make so many clouds all the time, and what is the role of chemtrails...
Recently, I found some very interesting answers to my questions at weatherwars.info, by a former meteorologist, Scott Stevens. He explains in several articles (Chemtrails, Cymatics, and others) that all the weather manipulations, including hurricanes etc., are probably made through acoustic waves from so called acoustic nodes that are all over the planet. Chemtrails are necessary for making and using them. He describes, p.e., also how was made the last devastating hurricane in Burma... and many others very interesting points. All of that sounds very credible to me...
Do you know his theory? If so, what do you think of it?
Do you think that we will ever have normal weather again?
Best greetings.
Harsa
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As far as any prolific gifters are able to determine, chemtrails are neutralized for up to a couple hundred miles around by a single orgonite cloudbuster and there are so many thousands of CBs, by now, that it might be hard to find an area which isn't covered, so it might be that Mike Stevens' assumption that chemtrails are a factor in weather warfare might be off target. I think there's no doubt that they used to be a factor, otherwise why would they be spewed over large, unpopulated areas?
One evidence that they're not a primary factor is that in many countries, probably including Burma, no chemtrails have b been deployed. Chemtrails seem to be mainly over the industrialized countries, in fact. They're sometimes seen in other areas after a lot of gifting has been done but the chemtrails don't normally persist very long, so for some reason the HAARPies are focusing on the more densely populated, industrialized regions of the world.
Where we live, for instance, is in the middle of a very large, mountainous forest and the chemtrail jets spray daily over the wilderness areas. Even those are disappearing fast, though, thanks to our water-gifting in the large lakes surrounding this region and it's disappearing even faster since I busted all those mountaintop arrays, which border our large, populated valley.
Mike Stevens, if memory serves, was a television meteorologist in Southern Idaho during the time that we disabled thousands of death towers and weather warfare facilities in his area. That effort produced astonishing positive changes in the atmosphere around him and, by then, there was plenty of discussion of orgonite cloudbusters on the web. I'm quirte sure that all the meteorologists at least had an opinion about what we were doing.
The fact that he never mentions us or Dr Reich seems a little suspect to me. I don't know how it is in East Europe but in America and Western Europe all of the mainstream scientists are conditioned to disregard all 'alternative' technology. Mike STevens is teh lone meteorologist who even mentions weather warfare, for instance. I think the rest understand that if they were to ever mention this, publicly, they would be blackballed, which is to say that nobody would ever hire them. Scientists are rigidly controlled this way. After all, scientific research usually requires capital funding. Fortunately for humanity, all of the successful free energy device inventors funded their own efforts, as Reich did ;)
Also, all weather warfare tech adn death tower tech are military secrets; not something a meteorologist (at least not one who wasn't working for the CIA and those are all silent) would have firsthand knowledge of. I only mention 'HAARP' because there has been official disclosure about HAARP's role in affecting weather with radio transmissions.
We've all seen massive acoustic transmitters, though, which are NOT officially listed as communication facilities so maybe these are the acoustic components of weather warfare. It's hard for me to imagine that they'd be used for anything else. Fortunately, these, too, are apparently easily disabled with orgonite. Radomes are also primary weather warfare facilities--busting one of those is like winning a poker round 8) and it usually produces phenomenal physical confirmations, also often earns some aggressive but impotent HAARP reprisals for some time afterward. We got those after I busted a bunch of mountaintop arrays, including a primary weatherball, with my plane. We also got a whole lot of friendly visitations from apparently grateful Sylphs.
Another form of transmitter that is apparently a weather warfare asset are the AWOS 'bowling pin' transmitters found at all the major airports. These are definitely used for radio navigation but psychics see so much black energy coming off them that we can assume that they're also weapons.
The old shortwave broadcast arrays were made obsolete by satellites in the early 1990s but many of them, including the one at the Vatican, are now weather warfare facilities. These are multiples of simple towers standing together. Carol and I disabled one at Delano, California, some years ago, and that caused the decades-old persistent dense smog of the massive San Joaquin Valley to disappear. The smog is still gone so that array was apparently pretty influential. I must add that Richard from Reno had disabled a similar array at the north end of the valley on the same day, though, so we assume the two were working in concert. We found that out from Richard some time later---a very good instance of The Operators' successful guidance in this case.
Very observant about the artificial storms' satellite signature, especially the center-outward formation of storms, including the country-wide one over Hungary!
Carol and I gifted two areas of the sea, near South Florida, where artificial storms were frequently formed. In both cases the sources were apparently underground/water but in each case, after we visited them with the boat and a lot of orgonite, no more storms were generated there.
It might be that one will need to disable all fo the regional HAARP facilities in Hungary in order to stop that 'war' on the Hungarians, though.
In America, one can see where there are no orgonite cloudbusters within forty miles or so by noting where artificial tornados touched down, last month during a massive weather warfare campaign. An orgonite cloudbuster disables chemtrials for up to a couple hundred miles but will only prevent a tornado touchdown for thirty or forty miles, sometimes less depending on how massive and focused the HAARP assault is.
Thanks again, Harsa, for the outstanding observations and comments! I think you're close to getting normal weather, actually. Once you start to see positive changes in your sky all you'll need to do is to gift the weather warfare facilities and death towerrs in an expanding circle around you. The contrast between the ungifted area and the gifted area will encourage and empower you, don't worry. Hopefully, someone in Hungary will also become committed and engaged in the same way and will network with you. I'll keep my eyes and ears open and will help you network when the opportunity occurs. The German-language gifting forum is also a good networking asset for you.
~Don
Hallo Don,
This is Harsa from Czech again. Thank you very much for your encouraging answer concerning CBs.
My work is going on fine, lately, I had a nice confirmation of blue sky after having gifted a nuke (that I was said had already been gifted before, maybe not sufficiently).
There is another problem that intrigues me now. I can see over my head that the skies are very unhealthy, always full of differnt forms of artificial clouds, sometimes mixed with natural ones. There are only short periods of normal skies when they stop their activities (to work elsewhere for a while) - then all the chemtrails and manmade clouds are dissolved rather quickly by the CB.
I was trying to compare what I see with my eyes and in satellite/radar images. I find that chemtrails and artificial clouds can be seen there quite easily. They have differnt colors and they behave in a different way than natural clouds. I became specially intrigued by very white clouds that start suddelnly from some point and spread rapidly in a circle (like shaving foam) over a large area - p.e. yesterday afternoon, such a cloud covered all Hungary in a few hours (it even had two hurricanlike eyes...). These clouds are surely meant to intensify rain, wind and thundrstorms. - My question was how and from where they can make so many clouds all the time, and what is the role of chemtrails...
Recently, I found some very interesting answers to my questions at weatherwars.info, by a former meteorologist, Scott Stevens. He explains in several articles (Chemtrails, Cymatics, and others) that all the weather manipulations, including hurricanes etc., are probably made through acoustic waves from so called acoustic nodes that are all over the planet. Chemtrails are necessary for making and using them. He describes, p.e., also how was made the last devastating hurricane in Burma... and many others very interesting points. All of that sounds very credible to me...
Do you know his theory? If so, what do you think of it?
Do you think that we will ever have normal weather again?
Best greetings.
Harsa
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As far as any prolific gifters are able to determine, chemtrails are neutralized for up to a couple hundred miles around by a single orgonite cloudbuster and there are so many thousands of CBs, by now, that it might be hard to find an area which isn't covered, so it might be that Mike Stevens' assumption that chemtrails are a factor in weather warfare might be off target. I think there's no doubt that they used to be a factor, otherwise why would they be spewed over large, unpopulated areas?
One evidence that they're not a primary factor is that in many countries, probably including Burma, no chemtrails have b been deployed. Chemtrails seem to be mainly over the industrialized countries, in fact. They're sometimes seen in other areas after a lot of gifting has been done but the chemtrails don't normally persist very long, so for some reason the HAARPies are focusing on the more densely populated, industrialized regions of the world.
Where we live, for instance, is in the middle of a very large, mountainous forest and the chemtrail jets spray daily over the wilderness areas. Even those are disappearing fast, though, thanks to our water-gifting in the large lakes surrounding this region and it's disappearing even faster since I busted all those mountaintop arrays, which border our large, populated valley.
Mike Stevens, if memory serves, was a television meteorologist in Southern Idaho during the time that we disabled thousands of death towers and weather warfare facilities in his area. That effort produced astonishing positive changes in the atmosphere around him and, by then, there was plenty of discussion of orgonite cloudbusters on the web. I'm quirte sure that all the meteorologists at least had an opinion about what we were doing.
The fact that he never mentions us or Dr Reich seems a little suspect to me. I don't know how it is in East Europe but in America and Western Europe all of the mainstream scientists are conditioned to disregard all 'alternative' technology. Mike STevens is teh lone meteorologist who even mentions weather warfare, for instance. I think the rest understand that if they were to ever mention this, publicly, they would be blackballed, which is to say that nobody would ever hire them. Scientists are rigidly controlled this way. After all, scientific research usually requires capital funding. Fortunately for humanity, all of the successful free energy device inventors funded their own efforts, as Reich did ;)
Also, all weather warfare tech adn death tower tech are military secrets; not something a meteorologist (at least not one who wasn't working for the CIA and those are all silent) would have firsthand knowledge of. I only mention 'HAARP' because there has been official disclosure about HAARP's role in affecting weather with radio transmissions.
We've all seen massive acoustic transmitters, though, which are NOT officially listed as communication facilities so maybe these are the acoustic components of weather warfare. It's hard for me to imagine that they'd be used for anything else. Fortunately, these, too, are apparently easily disabled with orgonite. Radomes are also primary weather warfare facilities--busting one of those is like winning a poker round 8) and it usually produces phenomenal physical confirmations, also often earns some aggressive but impotent HAARP reprisals for some time afterward. We got those after I busted a bunch of mountaintop arrays, including a primary weatherball, with my plane. We also got a whole lot of friendly visitations from apparently grateful Sylphs.
Another form of transmitter that is apparently a weather warfare asset are the AWOS 'bowling pin' transmitters found at all the major airports. These are definitely used for radio navigation but psychics see so much black energy coming off them that we can assume that they're also weapons.
The old shortwave broadcast arrays were made obsolete by satellites in the early 1990s but many of them, including the one at the Vatican, are now weather warfare facilities. These are multiples of simple towers standing together. Carol and I disabled one at Delano, California, some years ago, and that caused the decades-old persistent dense smog of the massive San Joaquin Valley to disappear. The smog is still gone so that array was apparently pretty influential. I must add that Richard from Reno had disabled a similar array at the north end of the valley on the same day, though, so we assume the two were working in concert. We found that out from Richard some time later---a very good instance of The Operators' successful guidance in this case.
Very observant about the artificial storms' satellite signature, especially the center-outward formation of storms, including the country-wide one over Hungary!
Carol and I gifted two areas of the sea, near South Florida, where artificial storms were frequently formed. In both cases the sources were apparently underground/water but in each case, after we visited them with the boat and a lot of orgonite, no more storms were generated there.
It might be that one will need to disable all fo the regional HAARP facilities in Hungary in order to stop that 'war' on the Hungarians, though.
In America, one can see where there are no orgonite cloudbusters within forty miles or so by noting where artificial tornados touched down, last month during a massive weather warfare campaign. An orgonite cloudbuster disables chemtrials for up to a couple hundred miles but will only prevent a tornado touchdown for thirty or forty miles, sometimes less depending on how massive and focused the HAARP assault is.
Thanks again, Harsa, for the outstanding observations and comments! I think you're close to getting normal weather, actually. Once you start to see positive changes in your sky all you'll need to do is to gift the weather warfare facilities and death towerrs in an expanding circle around you. The contrast between the ungifted area and the gifted area will encourage and empower you, don't worry. Hopefully, someone in Hungary will also become committed and engaged in the same way and will network with you. I'll keep my eyes and ears open and will help you network when the opportunity occurs. The German-language gifting forum is also a good networking asset for you.
~Don
Monday, July 07, 2008
Sunday, July 06, 2008
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Thursday, June 19, 2008
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Wednesday, June 04, 2008
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Monday, April 21, 2008
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Monday, January 14, 2008
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)