Terrorism versus freedom fighters

'TERRORISTS' ARE NOW 'FREEDOM FIGHTERS' ...

... 'FREE WORLD' HYPOCRISY AND THE MEK

Hello all ...

The hypocrisy of the United States, Britain and the rest of the ludicrously-named 'Free World' has long been legendary to anyone who has compared the moral, high-horse, rhetoric with the reality of the death and destruction they coldly perpetuate.

What we are seeing now in the long-planned devastation and conquest in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and all the rest is simply an extension and expansion of what has been happening for hundreds of years in the case of today's 'Free World' and for thousands in earlier forms of the mind-set expressed through the Roman Empire, Babylon, the 'Golden Horde' and Alexander the Great.

We have seen it with the British Empire which at one time had 'acquired' much of the planet and colonised the native peoples and the 'resources' on which they lived. We have had the French Empire, Spanish Empire, Portuguese Empire, Russian Empire, Ottoman Empire, Japanese Empire and Mongol Empire, the list goes on and on.

Today we have the unofficial, never stated, but real-all-the-same, American Empire, which is, in truth, like most of the others listed here, the Global Cabal Empire.

The prevailing modus operandi is to find an excuse to invade another land and then, well, to do so. At one time, especially before all the fake morality kicked in, they didn't need any justification beyond we are bloody greedy and someone else has what we want. This is the dynamic described as 'see, want, take'.

But the world has moved on from such blatant greed and savagery, right? We don't do that anymore. We have justice and fairness as our moral compass. We reel back in condemnation of 'empire' and one country or grouping imposing itself upon others. I know that's true because Obama said so.

But, of course, all this is only for public consumption. Humanity in general has grown up in many ways compared with other eras and the old undiluted conquest for sheer greed and control is no longer the easy sell that it once was.

So the empire-builders of today have swapped their policy of see, want, take, for a white charger and the 'sword of freedom'. They no longer kill and maim to invade and enslave. No, no. Now they kill and maim to 'protect' those they are killing and maiming.

The 'International community' is here to slaugh ... er, save you.'

It is still 'see, want, take', of course, but it is hidden behind laughable excuses based on the good guys ('us') protecting 'the people' from the 'bad guys' ('them', the demon-of-the-moment).

America and Britain didn't invade Afghanistan to secure their drug production and a strategic presence as part of a much bigger agenda for the region. They did so to 'get Bin Laden' and save the world from terrorism. They didn't invade Iraq for oil and other strategic reasons. They did so to save the people from Saddam Hussein. They didn't trash Libya to steal its oil and banking system. They did so to save the people from Colonel Gaddafi.

They are not seeking to invade Syria in a 'domino-effect' takeover of the Middle and Near East. Whatever gave you that idea? No, they want to invade to protect the people from President Assad. They don't want to invade Iran for the oil, control of a vast country at a pivotal point between east and west, and trigger another global conflict. They want to invade to protect the world from Iran's 'nuclear weapons programme'.

The statements and actions of the United States and the 'Free World' are littered with apparent contradictions. First they support side 'A' and later they condemn them and call for action against them (Mubarak in Egypt is but one of hundreds of examples). They fund what they call 'freedom fighters' and later condemn them as terrorists and a threat to the world (and vice-versa).

A classic example was provided by Cabal insider and co-founder of its Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski, when he admitted that he funded and trained into existence the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan when he was National Security Advisor to President Carter.

President Carter with his handler Brzezinski.

Brezezinski did this to challenge the Soviet Union satellite regime in the capital Kabul in the hope of enticing Moscow to invade Afghanistan and entrap them in what he called 'their Vietnam'. A man called Osama bin Laden was hired from Saudi Arabia to lead the resistance to the Soviet occupation. The plan worked and to a large extent it left the Soviet Union mortally wounded. The Soviet empire collapsed in the years that followed.

But after 9/11 we had Brzezinski and his associates in the Cabal-owned American establishment supporting an invasion of Afghanistan to meet the 'threat to the world' of the same Mujahedeen and their 'spiritual' leaders, the Taliban, and one-time 'freedom-fighter' Osama bin Laden became public enemy number one.

All this appears to be a mass of contradiction and paradox. But from the Cabal's point of view it is nothing of the kind. There is a common theme here - whatever suits the Cabal agenda at any time is what they say and do.

So when it suits them to support Mubarak in Egypt with massive aid payments they do so. When circumstances change and they want him gone, he becomes the tyrant he always was, but this time officially. When it suits them to train and fund 'freedom fighters' they do so. When the agenda requires that the freedom fighters morph into terrorists then that is what happens (and vice-versa).

Which brings us Iran and a terrorist group known under various names like the MEK, MKO or PMOI - The Peoples' Mujahedeen of Iran. I will call them the MEK for the purposes of this article.

The group was founded in 1965 to challenge the rule of the Shah of Iran, the vicious dictator installed by America and Britain after the coup they engineered through the CIA at the request of British Intelligence to remove Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953. It was known as Operation Ajax.

Mosaddegh committed the capital crime of introducing many social reforms in Iran and, most crucially in terms of his removal, he nationalised the Iranian oil industry which was until then the fiefdom of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, now known as British Petroleum or BP.

Mosaddegh wanted more of the oil revenues to be retained by the Iranian people and soon he was ousted by a coup organised to a large extent by Norman Schwarzkopf Sr., the father of 'Stormin' Norman', commander of the Coalition Forces in the 1991 Gulf War, and Kermit 'Kim' Roosevelt, the grandson of President Theodore Roosevelt and leading CIA operative in the Middle East.

Mosaddegh was convicted of treason by the Shah of Iran's military court and sentenced to death. The sentence was subsequently commuted, but he would spend the rest of his life either in prison or under house arrest. This is what happens when you put your people before the Cabal's best interests.

The MEK, or People's Mujahedin of Iran, is certainly a movable feast, as they say. It has changed sides more often than a burger on a barbeque. It opposed the Shah and his tyrannical rule in the years after Mosaddegh's overthrow and then sided with the Ayatollah Khomeini after the Islamic revolution ended the reign of the Shah in 1979.

But by 1981 the MEK was already embarked on a terrorist campaign against the Khomeini regime and this included fighting with Iraq under the name 'National Liberation Army of Iran' in the Saddam Hussein-instigated war with Iran during the 1980s in which, Iranian government sources contend, the MEK killed some 17,000 Iranians.

Many of the MEK fighters have been women.

The MEK killed six Americans in the 1970s and also attempted to kidnap the US Ambassador to Iran, Douglas MacArthur II, in 1971, and to assassinate more American personnel. They killed other Western targets, supported the takeover of the American embassy in Tehran, and opposed the release of US diplomats held hostage by the Iranian regime and called for their execution.

The MEK was behind the bombing of one of the major shrines of Shia Islam at Mashad, Iran, in 1994 when nearly 30 people were killed and 200 wounded by a bomb which American officials have claimed was built by Ramzi Yousef, who is alleged to have been the 'mastermind' behind the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 (in which the FBI was also involved).

Iran, Iraq, the United States and Canada designated the MEK a terrorist group and the same happened in Europe until early 2009 when it was removed from the European Union list of terrorist organisations. The MEK claims to have renounced violence in 2001and US Special Forces brokered a controversial ceasefire with the group after the 2003 invasion of Iraq which was the MEK's prime base of operation under Saddam Hussein.

The MEK, led by Maryam Rajavi, is today the dominant force within the National Council of Resistance of Iran which claims to be a parliament in exile (see Libyan 'rebels', Iraqi government in exile before 2003, etc., etc.) and now operates as an asset of the United States and Israel in the attempted conquest of Iran.

MEK leader Maryam Rajavi with 'Mr 9/11', Rudolf Giuliani.

The MEK provided the US with the excuse they needed to target Iran diplomatically and militarily when it was allegedly the first source of 'information' that Iran was embarked on a nuclear weapons programme. But the MEK involvement in the US-Israel demonisation of Iran goes much deeper than that - especially with Israel.

I am not saying for a moment that this is true of all MEK members, nor even most, but there is a core within the organisation that sees this as a means of toppling the Iranian regime. They are, however, in terms of the country they profess to love, playing with fire.

The Mossad, the Israeli (Rothschild) intelligence and enforcement agency, specialises in terrorist attacks that are blamed on others (see 9/11) and in using, funding and training 'hired guns' within the target community to do its very dirty work. The MEK is now one of them.

American officials speaking off the record to NBC News are reported to have confirmed the claims by Iran that the MEK is a Mossad front operation responsible for the murder of a series of Iranian nuclear scientists. Some of the attacks have involved people on motorcycles attaching small magnetic devices to the victims' cars and Iran says that Mossad is providing the bombs and the training on how to use them.

The aftermath of one attack that killed a nuclear scientist. Republican presidential candidates Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum have endorsed the murder of the scientists. Santorum called it 'a wonderful thing'.

Mohammad Javad Larijani, a close aide to Iran's so-called supreme leader, said that the relationship between the MEK and Israel is 'very intricate and close'. He said that Israel was funding the MEK and in return it was serving Israeli interests inside Iran.

Larijani said that the ties between the MEK and Israel are confirmed by documents in their possession and the interrogation of a MEK operative that was broadcast on Iranian television. NBC News reported that two senior American officials had confirmed, on agreement of anonymity, that the MEK was funded, trained and armed by Israel and was responsible for the attacks on nuclear scientists.

The Cabal's agents in government operate on the principle that 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' and the more the 'West' has sought to demonise Iran the more the MEK's violent past has been rewritten so they can take advantage of its violent present.

A campaign has been waged by the usual suspects to have the MEK removed from the US list of terrorist organisations and this has included an advertisement in the New York Times calling for the MEK to be 'de-listed'. Among the signatures on the ad were those of former Attorney General, Michael Mukasey, former Homeland Security Secretary, Tom Ridge, former FBI Director Louis Freeh and former United Nations Ambassador, John Bolton.

If it moves, Bolton wants to bomb it, so long as he is far away when it happens. Bolton was a prominent 'Neocon' behind the Bush administration and has long demanded that US missiles are unleashed on Iran.

More lies from 'bomb-it' Bolton.

Tom Ridge told MSNBC that there was 'an extraordinary group of bipartisan or even apolitical leaders, military leaders, diplomats, the United States ... the United Kingdom, the European Union, even a US District Court in Washington, said that this group that was put on the foreign terrorist organization watch list in 1997 doesn't deserve to be there.'

All these people and organisations are representatives or gofers for the Cabal that wants to free all restrictions on working with the MEK as they seek the overthrow of the Iranian regime. My goodness, it is all so transparent when you know what the game is.

It can be summed up as one law for us and another law for everyone else.

MEK terrorist leader Maryam Rajavi with Michael Mukasey, Rudy Guiliani, Frances Townsend (a one-time Homeland Security advisor) and Tom Ridge (who was head of Homeland Security to 'fight terrorism'). They all want the MEK delisted as a terrorist group.

Daniel Byman, a professor in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, rightly said that if Israel is using the MEK to assassinate targets then this 'borders on terrorism.' Actually, it is terrorism - state-sponsored terrorism - and for countries like Israel, the United States and Britain this is a way of life.

Byman said that, in theory, states cannot be terrorists, but if they hired locals to do assassinations, that would be state sponsorship. Yes it would, and it is, but while most other countries are expected to play by the rules the United States, Britain and Israel prefer to do whatever suits them whenever it suits them.

That is why one-time 'freedom fighters' (like Osama bin Laden) become 'terrorists' and one-time 'terrorists' (like the MEK) become 'freedom-fighters'. What suits the agenda in the moment is what happens.

The word hypocrisy 'the practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess' does even begin to suffice to describe this modus operandi. Genetic lying is more like it and it has become an epidemic since the targeting of the Middle and Near East began in earnest after 9/11.

The question to ask when we are trying to see the wood for the trees in all this is 'who benefits?' Who benefits from what is being proposed in any moment? Who benefits from the MEK being 'delisted' and American military intelligence freed from the, at least official, restrictions of working with them?

Those who condemn 'terrorism' while setting the world ablaze. The usual story.