Sunday, September 23, 2012

david icke newsletter: The GMO population cull

Editors note:  PLEASE PLEASE diarise November 6 2012 - this is when Prop 37 (to enable laelling of GMO's is voted on in California) - it will be very interesting to see how this turns out

The David Icke Newsletter, September 23rd, 2012



Hello all ...

There are often times as I go about my business when one subject will appear on the radar screen day after day in a short time. Such has been the case in the last week or two of genetically-modified organisms (GMO).

I have been tracking this year after year and warning of the consequences for the health of humans, animals and nature of this insane technological manipulation of what we eat and now even parts of the scientific mainstream are beginning to confirm the extraordinary scale of damage and death that has already ensued and warning of even greater consequences to come if we allow this to continue.

The alternative media - the real media - has been on the case since GMO was first mooted and all these years later it is yet again being proved to be right.

Genetic Roulette, the excellent documentary that I have posted after this article, reveals that since the 1990s when genetically-modified food began to impact upon the American diet the number of Americans with at least three chronic diseases has nearly doubled and the nation's position in the world table for infant mortality has 'plunged'.

Cancer, heart disease, autism, obesity, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and food allergies have soared in the same period while the fertility of the land is being devastated, genetic diversity destroyed, and between 60 and 100 per cent of air samples taken by the US Geological Survey contain Monsanto's lethal Roundup herbicide used in vast quantities in essential conjunction with GMO crops.

People in cities far away from the crop fields have Roundup in their urine and it is in the blood of pregnant women and unborn children. Studies have found an increase of up to 70 times in the birth defects of children born to workers on farms spraying Roundup or 'glyphosate'.

The world is insane, those that control it are insane, and all I have to say to prove that obvious truth is 'genetically-modified organisms'. I rest my case. Never in known human history has such a mass destruction of the genetic pool been embarked upon, but here we are.

It is insane that it is being done and it is insane the number of people prepared by choice to stand for it and feed themselves and their children Frankenstein food designed to damage their health and end their lives long before this would naturally happen. Crazy is now the new normal.

Here are just a few examples of the magnitude of crazy. I am not even talking your average crazy becoming the new normal. I mean full-blown clinical insanity where the patient should never be left alone for their own sake and for the protection of everyone else.

We are talking Hannibal Lecter on a really bad day.

Monsanto executive.

Genetically-modified crops and animals inter-splice the DNA genetic code between different animals and crops and even between animals and crops - with some human genes thrown in. This rewires the natural order and generates new diseases and susceptibility to diseases which the immune system cannot deal with.

They are genetically combining cabbages with scorpion venom, spiders with goats, fish with tomatoes and human genes with rice. We also have cats genetically-engineered to glow in the dark and bananas, potatoes, lettuce and carrots manipulated to produce vaccines and release them when eaten. Have a banana - take your shot.

One of the biggest of so many health dangers from all this is inflammation in various forms which can lead to a stream of diseases including kidney and heart disease, disorders of the digestive and immune systems, cancer, diabetes and Alzheimer's. This does not even begin to be a complete list.

All this has been allowed by the Big-Biotech-controlled US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which is supposed to be an agency of government protecting the population from Big Biotech. This is what people need to understand - the corporations control all the agencies of government that are officially there to police them.

The crazies that Australians allow to control their country have given permission for 'trials' (foot in the door to mass introduction) of genetically-modified wheat with major consequences for human health and without any tests to establish its short-term and long-term effects.

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) in Australia has kindly and sanely produced a form of wheat with manipulated proteins that suppresses enzymes which scientists believe could have deadly consequences for the liver. Professor Judy Carman, a biochemist and director of the Institute of Health and Environmental Research, said:

If this silences the same sort of gene in us - as it silences in the wheat - then, well, children who are born with this enzyme not working tend to die by the age of about five. And adults with this problem, just kind of get more and more sick, and more and more tired, until they get very, very ill indeed.

Confirmation of the cause and effect between GMO and disease is the fact that there are countless examples of people and animals recovering - often dramatically - from their health conditions after removing GM food from their diet.

Witness the experience of Danish pig farmer Ib Borup Perderson. He published his findings after ridding his pigs of a whole range of illnesses when he stopped feeing them a GM diet.

Perderson said that after introducing GM the pigs developed chronic diarrhoea, birth defects, reproductive problems, reduced appetite, bloating, stomach ulcers, reduced litter sizes and weaker and smaller piglets. When he ditched the GM there were noticeable improvements in two days and their better health went on from there.

The same has happened with people after their doctors advised them to stop eating GM food (increasingly not easy in America). Patients with apparently long-term, even permanent conditions such as immune disorders, allergies, skin problems, arthritis, irritable bowel syndrome, migraines and restless leg syndrome saw their symptoms disappear with the GMO from their diet.

Put these words into a search engine for many examples: 'Dramatic Health Recoveries Reported By Patients Who Took Their Doctor's Advice and Stopped Using GMO Foods'.

Genetically-modified corn has been manipulated to produce its own insecticide and when this is consumed the insecticide can breach the walls of the intestine and release undigested food into the body.

The immune system understandably treats this as a threat and produces an immune response to deal with it. From this point the immune system is programmed to see the food involved as a danger and attacks whenever it is eaten. This is why there has been such a catastrophic increase in food allergies among consumers of GMO. The same immune response also been linked to autism and premature aging among much else, including cancer.

Monsanto GMO crops are designed to work with Monsanto Roundup herbicide which kills weeds by sucking out their nutrients. But it does the same to the crops and the animals that eat the crops and the humans who eat the crops and animals. GMO crop growing also removes the nutrients from the soil. You can see the pattern.

This is all planned and connects with the new laws to drastically reduce the doses of dietary supplements to below the nutrient levels needed for survival, let alone health. This is the mass population cull in action. Get those who are asleep directly through GMO contamination and stop the awakening from overcoming that by taking the necessary dosage of nutrient supplements.

Roundup also causes birth defects. Laboratory animals subjected to Roundup have many pregnancies end prematurely and/or become infertile. In the same period since GMO became widely used in the United States there has been a massive increase in infertility confirmed by the corresponding increase in fertility clinics.

Male sperm counts are plummeting and just by coincidence the Global Cabal have a plan for mass depopulation. This is all part of that. A California biotech company called Epicyte patented a gene in 2001that if ingested in any form would make men and women sterile and infertile.

The gene causes the male immune system to produce antibodies to kill their own sperm and the sterility that follows is irreversible. When sperm enters women who have consumed the Epicyte gene they produce antibodies to the sperm and become infertile.

Epicyte scientists took antibodies from infertile women, isolated the genes responsible for attacking sperm and genetically-engineered them into corn seeds. Epicyte president Mitch Hein said: 'We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.' Mr Heinous said it was a possible solution to overpopulation and he went on:

Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm. They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.

Population cullers like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation must be drooling. Now the good news: Monsanto and Dupont subsequently formed a joint venture which bought the Epicyte company to 'commercialise' the Epicyte gene. As Rima E Laibow, Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation said:

Do you want to know if the food that you're eating contains the Epicyte gene? Sure you do. How about the food that your children are eating, or your grandchildren? Sure you do. But the FDA, the Fraud and Death Administration, has made sure that under current laws it is illegal for you to have that information.

Another potential weapon of the cullers and sterilisers is a GMO cottonseed derivative called gossypol which causes permanent sterilisation in men. The Rockefeller Foundation annual report of 1986 revealed that it was funding research into the widespread use of fertility blockers including gossypol:

Male contraceptive studies are focused on gossypol, a natural substance extracted from the cotton plant, and identified by Chinese researchers as having an anti-fertility effect on men. Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive. The Foundation supported research on gossypol's safety, reversibility and efficacy in seven different 1986 grants.

The Rockefellers are long-time infamous eugenicists who were the funding and 'brains' behind Hitler's race purity movement as I have exposed in great detail in my books.

Monsanto contaminates cow genes with the deadly e-coli bacteria because this produces a hormone to increase milk yields by speeding up the metabolism. This so-called 'crack for cows', or bovine growth hormone, is injected into the cow to generate a list of health consequences both for the cows and anyone drinking their milk.

These include the udder infection mastitis and the production of more puss - yes, puss - which is mixed with the milk along with still more antibiotics used to treat the increased infections. Bovine growth hormone also increases the content in milk of a hormone called IGF-1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1).

Those with high concentrations of IGF-1 are more likely to develop cancer - four times the average rate in the case of prostate cancer and pre-menopausal women are seven times more likely to develop breast cancer. Rates of breast cancer in the United States have leaped since the introduction of GMO.

Almost all infant food formulas in the US use milk from cows treated with bovine growth hormone and derivatives of GM corn, plus genetically-modified soy. The US government provides free formula to some two million babies - but only the genetically-modified variety. It is eugenics under any other name. Culling the poorest and most vulnerable.

Corn is such a major target of Big Biotech because it is in almost everything. GMO now accounts for 70 per cent of corn (maize) grown in the United States and 94 per cent of soybeans.

GMO can also be found in between 70 and 75 per cent of processed foods in the US. This, and more, is what they want to impose on the entire world. They want everything genetically-modified - they have already tried to replace grass on golf courses and school playing fields with GMO varieties.

There is now gathering scientific exposure of the lethal nature of GMO from those who refuse to stay quiet any longer. A peer-reviewed study by a research team at the University of Caen in France has revealed how it causes cancer, organ damage and premature death.

It is the first study - note the FIRST - to investigate the long-term effects of GMO and Monsanto's Roundup and the researchers found that rats exposed to even the smallest amounts of Roundup-resistant GM maize developed cancer and severe liver and kidney damage in a matter of months. There was a 200 to 300 per cent increase in big tumours and some were massive.

Fifty per cent of male rats and seventy per cent of females died prematurely while this was the case for only thirty and twenty per cent among those in a control group that were not fed GMO poisons.

Even rats given water over two years containing Roundup at levels permitted in human drinking water died significantly earlier than rats fed on a standard diet. Roundup is actually recommended apparently on the BBC show Gardeners Question Time. Unbelievable.

The Caen researchers established that the lowest doses of Roundup in drinking water, comfortably within the official limits for human consumption, caused severe health consequences. As I have been saying for 30 years and more - ignore the official 'safe limits' because they are simply defined at a level that allows the corporations to do whatever they want. This is true of pesticides, fluoride, radiation, the lot of them.

Dr Michael Antoniou, a molecular biologist at King's College, London, and a member of an independent scientific council which supported the study, said: 'This research shows an extraordinary number of tumours developing earlier and more aggressively - particularly in female animals. I am shocked by the extreme negative health impacts.'

Jose Bove, the French vice-chairman of the European Parliament's commission for agriculture, demanded an immediate ban on all growing and importation of GMO crops in the EU. He said:

This study finally shows we are right and that it is urgent to quickly review all GMO evaluation processes. National and European food security agencies must carry out new studies financed by public funding to guarantee healthy food for European consumers.

Genetically-modified crops are widely grown in North America, Brazil and China but there is still great resistance in Europe. Have no doubt, however, that GMO will be illegally infiltrating the European diet, too, on a scale that would likely shock people.

A Monsanto spokesman said of the Caen study: 'We will review it thoroughly, as we do all studies that relate to our products and technologies.' What a load of tosh. They will not 'review it', they will try to trash it and the Cabal media is already saying that 'experts cast doubt on the findings' No, Monsanto and GMO front people try to cast doubt on the obvious truth.

The GMO nightmare began when Father Bush Vice-President, Dan Quayle, the man who couldn't spell 'potato', announced in 1992 a policy on GMO in line with what market-leader Monsanto demanded. This was justified on the grounds that the industry would increase its worth from $4 billion a year to $50 billion by the year 2000 'if we resist the spread of unnecessary regulation'.

Money was the stated reason for what was to destroy the health of a nation, but a mass people-cull was the real motivation. An idiot and gofer like Quayle may or may not have been too far down the food chain to realise that, but that is what all this is really about.

The revolving door between corporations like the biotech giant Monsanto and the agencies that are supposed to police them is legendary (see Human Race Get Off Your Knees in which I provide a long list of examples).

This man is responsible for death and suffering of multiple millions - with so many more to come if GMO is allowed to continue.

The most blatant example of this criminal conflict of interest is Michael R Taylor who worked for a law firm representing Monsanto and was responsible for introducing the corporation's 'food and drug law' practice. He was also Monsanto's Vice President for Public Policy.

Intertwined with his Monsanto roles he has been a major player in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Agriculture which are supposed to police and oversee Monsanto and the rest of the biotech industry.

Taylor has been attorney and executive assistant to the Commissioner at the FDA; Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service for the Department of Agriculture; Senior advisor to the FDA Commissioner and then Deputy Commissioner for Foods at the FDA.

Talk about a conflict of interest. One side of the revolving door he is the poacher and the other side he is the gamekeeper; or rather isn't. Monsanto's Taylor was in charge of FDA labelling policy when the decision was made to treat Monsanto GMO crops as essentially the same as non-GMO - thus not requiring independent checks on the safety of GMO or labelling.

The FDA said: 'We know of no information showing that the foods created from these new methods differ in any meaningful or uniform way.' It was a big lie, a statement of sheer insanity, and people like FDA/Monsanto double agent, Michael Taylor, knew it.

A lawsuit later brought to light 44,000 internal FDA documents which revealed that GMO can produce allergies, toxins, new diseases, antibiotic-resistant diseases, nutritional problems and cancer-causing agents. They also confirmed that scientists and experts at the FDA had said that GM food was different from that produced normally and therefore had different risks. The effect on human health in GMO-soaked America has since proved catastrophic and potentially genocidal.

How come, then, that the FDA said publicly that there was no difference between non-GMO food and that produced with GMO, especially by Monsanto, which has led to the FDA not requiring independent safety checks on GMO products? One of the key people responsible for taking that line was, yes, Michael Taylor, the number two at the FDA, a former attorney to Monsanto, and later a Monsanto Vice-President for Public Policy.

Taylor was also at the US Department of Agriculture between 1994 and 1996 and in his government roles he was highly influential in the decision not to insist that GMO had to be labelled which has denied the public the free choice to eat or not eat GMO food.

Michael Taylor was a partner of the King and Spalding law firm acting for Monsanto when he drafted a proposal for both the company and the International Food Bio-Technology Council (IFBC) on how GMO should be regulated. Michael Hansen, a Senior Staff Scientist at the Consumers Union, said:

If you look at the proposal that was drafted for IFBC that was Michael Taylor's with the one that was published [by the FDA], it was very, very similar - so if he didn't write it, it looks like somebody took what he wrote and changed it slightly for the policy.

James Maryanski, Biotechnology Coordinator at the FDA from 1985 to 2006, says that Michael Taylor was the force behind the FDA policy which included how genetic engineering and bovine growth hormones would be dealt with.

All this must have cost the lives of multiple millions of people and animals since then and caused suffering to untold numbers who have had their health devastated by GMO. It was also Taylor at the FDA who ensured that Monsanto's genetically-engineered bovine growth hormone (rbGH/rbST) could be injected into cows to increase milk production without any labelling for people to make a choice.

He even wrote a paper saying that if producers of milk without the growth hormone labelled their milk as such they should be mandated to include a disclaimer from the FDA saying that there was no difference between milk with bovine growth hormone and milk without it.

Taylor has been described as possibly being responsible for 'more food-related illnesses and deaths than anyone in history'.

This man should be in jail with the key thrown mid-Atlantic, but where is he now? He was appointed by Obama to be his 'food safety czar' in charge of all United States food safety policy at the FDA and is now Senior 'Advisor' [yeah, right] to the Commissioner of the FDA. Taylor's policy is Monsanto's policy and there can be no greater confirmation that corporations control governments than Taylor's career with Monsanto and government agencies which are supposed to protect us from Monsanto.

This is why Big Biotech is getting virtually all that it wants from the FDA while organic farmers and growers and small farms in general are being destroyed by a mass of new and ludicrous laws on the grounds of 'food safety' imposed by FDA SWAT teams made up of monumental goons with guns in their hands and air in their heads.

Food fascism isn't coming - it's here.

Thanks to Taylor and the FDA, Monsanto is responsible for ensuring its own GMO poisons are safe - not the government 'public protection' body, the FDA, with its food 'safety' policy dictated by a man bought and paid for, body and what passes for soul, by Monsanto.

How could this ludicrous situation come about? The FDA is owned by Monsanto and the biotech industry as confirmed not only by Monsanto personnel like Taylor being employed by the FDA, but also by FDA whistleblowers who have said publicity that Big Biotech and Big Pharma own the FDA and its Commissioners like the current one, Margaret Hamburg.

Rothschild Zionist Margaret Hamburg heads a despicable organisation and its policy comes from the top (and those who tell the 'top' what to do).

Not content with imposing GMO on Americans, the Monsanto/FDA double agent, Michael Taylor, wants everyone to enjoy the benefits of death by food. He was a senior fellow at the think-tank, Resources for the Future, where he published two reports on aid for African agriculture (so beloved of the outrageous Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation). Both of Taylor's reports were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Isabella Kenfield said in an article at

The 'penultimate draft' of Taylor's 2002 paper was reviewed by Dr. Robert Horsch, a Monsanto executive for more than 25 years, who left in 2006 to work at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It states, 'The ultimate concern of this report is how innovative seed technology derived from patented tools of biotechnology can be developed and disseminated for the benefit of small-scale and subsistence African farmers.'

Decoded: How we can help Monsanto do to Africa what is has already done to America. Two of the major funders of Resources for the Future reported in fiscal year 2010 were the Environmental Protection Agency (see FDA, same deal) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which funds a stream of Cabal projects including mass vaccinations, mass population reduction, mass global use of GMO, weather manipulation and propaganda for the lie about human-caused climate change.

Nice man, Bill Gates, well, Bono thinks so, anyway. Second thoughts, that's not the greatest character reference.

This man is either cold, callous and heartless beyond belief or he's an idiot. One of the two must be true given what he funds through his foundation. Personally, I don't think he is that much of an idiot.

There is a vote on November 6th in California which, if successful, will impose the mandatory labelling of all GMO products in the state. It is called Proposition 37 and it calls for:

• Labelling of all raw or processed food from plants or animals if genetically manipulated in specified ways.

• Ban the labelling of such foods - wait for it - as 'natural' as they currently do. Nothing is shocking to me anymore, but that gets close. Monsanto also had to be stopped from calling lethal Roundup 'biodegradable'.

Even if passed - as my goodness it should be if there is any hope left - it will exempt small amounts of genetically-modified material from feeding or injecting animals with GMO so long as the animals are not genetically-engineered themselves. That should not be there, but it is far better than the current situation of no labelling at all.

The very fact that this going to a public vote in one state when Michael Taylor's brief at the FDA is officially to ensure that food labels contain clear and accurate information shows how crazy and corrupt the system has become.

A similar vote on GMO labelling in Vermont was stopped when Monsanto threatened lawsuits against the state government despite four separate polls revealing that more than 90 per cent of residents wanted labelling. Monsanto and its fellow corporations are just arrogant bullies - and their gang is the Federal government.

So far Monsanto has spent more than seven million dollars to persuade Californians to vote against the labelling of their food. Add that to the contributions of those other expressions of evil, DuPont, Bayer, Dow, BASF, and Syngenta, and those other producers of essential nutrition, PepsiCo, Nestle, Coca-Cola and others, and you have some $20 million being spent on the 'no' campaign.

They well understand that if labelling is enforced the sales of GMO products will plummet.

Think about what that says about where we are. A corporation is spending millions to persuade people not to know the content of the food they are eating when that food has been genetically-modified in ways that make it impossible to know what the full consequences are going to for human health - but clearly we already know enough to see that it is potentially genocidal in its scale.

Anyone who votes 'no' on November 6th is, for me, clinically insane.

Monsanto and Big Biotech own most governments of the world, especially the United States, and this why, as WikiLeaks documents confirmed, the US government has threatened European countries with trade wars if they don't succumb to GMO.

Cables from 2007 show that the US government was manipulating behind the scenes on behalf of Monsanto and company to force GMO on Europeans. Craig Stapleton, the US Ambassador to France and a business partner of then US President Boy George Bush, wrote under his cover-name, Country team Paris, to outline plans to pressure Europe to accept Monsanto GMO:

Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this [resistance to GMO] is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits. The list should be measured rather than vicious and must be sustainable over the long term, since we should not expect an early victory. Moving to retaliation will make clear that the current path has real costs to EU interests and could help strengthen European pro-biotech voices.

Other US State Department cables reveal that US diplomats are working directly for Monsanto and Big Biotech. One said: 'In response to recent urgent requests by [Spanish rural affairs ministry] state secretary Josep Puxeu and Monsanto, post requests renewed US government support of Spain's science-based agricultural biotechnology position through high-level US government intervention.'

The cables expose how the US and Spain have worked together to block the strengthening of biotech laws within the EU. A cable from the US Embassy in Madrid said: 'If Spain falls, the rest of Europe will follow.'

While I have been reading through research material this week I have seen campaigners again and again say that Monsanto and the Biotech cartel is doing all this for money, but that is certainly not the case. Yes, of course, these people are obsessed with profits, but that is not the prime reason that such grotesque manipulation is going on to ensure, as Monsanto demands, that the entire global food supply will be GMO.

The real reason is to dramatically cull the world population by billions. This goal is written in their own documents and confirmed privately by their own agents of mass murder. They want to see the world population at least halved and preferably down to a billion or even half a billion. It is currently above seven.

GMO is a crucial element in this mass cull and I will be putting all the pieces and dots together on this in my presentation at the Wembley Arena on October 27th along with so much new information on a long list of subjects.

The real insanity is not that these people are doing all this to the food through stupidity, though that, of course, would be crazy enough. The real insanity is that they are doing it on purpose to a specific end of human genocide.

Another aspect of this cull is to deny people alternatives to cabal food and medicine until they are too weak to resist the takeover. You now regularly see attacks by 'scientific studies' on organic food - including the breathtaking one recently when 'scientists' announced through a compliant, unquestioning media, that eating organic food is basically no healthier than eating food infested with pesticides, herbicides and all the other toxins.

Or, at least, that is the way the media presented the findings worldwide.

Harry Wallop, a 'journalist' on the London Daily Telegraph, reported these ludicrous 'findings' with glee and confessed that he had long lied to his wife that the local store had run out of organic milk to justify him bringing home non-organic.

Wally, sorry Wallop, ended his article by saying: 'Tomorrow, the baby is going to get an extra dollop of pesticide-sprayed carrots.' I know, you lose the will to live, but this is the mentality that so often stands between what goes on the world and what these people tell us is going on.

The 'findings' that equated food with poisons with food with far less or no poisons came from the Stanford Center for Health Policy, a subsidiary of Stanford's Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies which is financially supported by, among others, agricultural giant Cargill and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which is closely connected to Cargill and Monsanto.

Other donors include Goldman Sachs, BP, Google and a stream of other bloodline corporations and foundations. The 'study' must have been completely independent then. Cargill are among the corporations promoting genetically-modified food and opposing efforts to have it labelled as such.

One of the lead 'researchers' in this outrageous misrepresentation of organic food was Dr Ingram Olkin who collaborated with the tobacco industry to misdirect people into believing that smoking was not a danger to health.

The Stanford 'research' (bollocks) was systematically used by the global media to attack the truth that organic food without pesticides is healthier than food full of poisons and to mock and ridicule those who wish to eat healthier food. It was quite obviously all coordinated.

Wallop on the Telegraph in the UK had a mirror image in Roger Cohen, a columnist with The New York Times. He attacked what he termed 'the organic fable' and described organics as an 'ideology' and akin to a pseudoscientific cult.

Cohen also either lied, or was not intelligent enough to read the report he promotes, when he said the study had found that 'organic food was not less likely to be contaminated by dangerous bacteria like E.coli.' It actually said that organic meats had significantly lower levels of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

But the real reason for this coordinated attack on organics and those that choose to eat healthier food was encapsulated in this single paragraph in Cohen's ludicrous article:

To feed a planet of 9 billion people, we are going to need high yields not low yields; we are going to need genetically modified crops; we are going to need pesticides and fertilizers and other elements of the industrialized food processes that have led mankind to be better fed and live longer than at any time in history.

Was that written in The New York Times or Monsanto News? My goodness, it is so blatant. The claim that the world can only be fed with genetically-modified food is not only a lie, it is the opposite of the truth. GMO is leading the world down the road to starvation by destroying the soil and the diversity of seed varieties, and with the so-called terminator seeds that are useless after one planting.

What happens when only a few GMO varieties are left and something happens to destroy them or their production? Mass global starvation. Anyone think, in the face of the tidal wave of evidence, that this is not the idea? awarded Cohen its Idiot of the Year Award which is a major feat given the competition. The website's excellent Mike Adams wrote:

With this editorial, the New York Times is saying that all consumers who buy organic products have a mental disorder. It's probably only a matter of time before people who buy organics are 'detained' at psychiatric hospitals for 72 hours of 'observation' during which you will be force-fed chemical medications. They're already doing this to U.S. veterans who question the political leadership of America, by the way.

According to Roger Cohen of the New York Times, only the people who eat pesticides and GMOs have brains that work correctly. Everybody else is delusional. He writes, 'the organic ideology is an elitist, pseudoscientific indulgence shot through with hype.' But eating chemical pesticides and genetically engineered foods containing toxins grown inside the grains is perfectly rational and intelligent, I suppose. It's 'scientific' to want to eat poison! All you morons who want clean food are delusional, Cohen insists!

But where did I start? The world is mad and run by mad people. The sane need to take it back - and quick.


No comments: