The David Icke Newsletter, April 21st, 2013
THE 'F' WORD ...
Hello all ...
Fear is defined as: 'An unpleasant emotion caused by the belief that someone or something is dangerous, likely to cause pain, or a threat' and 'A feeling of agitation and anxiety caused by the presence or imminence of danger.'
By these criteria almost everyone is experiencing some level of fear - will I lose my job? Will my relationship end? Can I meet the rent? What will happen to my kids? You could fill a library with reasons that people find to fear and to feel agitated, anxious and unsettled.
When things are not okay people worry about what to do about that and when things are okay they worry about them becoming not okay. Catch 22, 34, 59, whatever number you like.
But when you look at the overwhelming majority of these endless sources of fear they are not triggered by what is happening, but by what could happen. The fear processes of the human body-mind don't know the difference between the two. Think of something that frightens you and your body and emotions will begin to respond as if it is real.
It is easy to see why. When you are actually experiencing something frightening the information is delivered by the senses to the brain and from there the body-mind is alerted to a perceived threat. When we think about something frightening the only difference is that one part of the brain delivers the information to itself and the same response mechanisms are fired into action.
Of course, when something is actually happening everything is heightened, but the basic principles are the same and such are the number of 'reasons to be fearful' that most people live their lives with what I call 'background anxiety'.
This is the uneasy feeling that is pretty much always there, but overlaid most of the time by focus on a task, a few drinks and anything that can fill the silence and avoid solitude. This is why so many people don't like silence. They have to switch on the TV when they walk in a room or the radio whenever they drive.
It has long been my view, as I have detailed in the books, that our energetic environment - what I call the Matrix - is encoded with frequencies that stimulate genetically-programmed background anxiety which is on constant alert to be triggered into full-blown fear and terror.
Fear is the prime medium of mass control and also energetic sustenance to the vampires of low-vibrational human emotion that ultimately dictate the human Control System. Christine Fitzgerald, the close friend of Princess Diana who I mentioned in a recent newsletter, had it right when she told me:
They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck your blood. Fear is their food. They can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing.
Fear is the foundation of all human control because (a) it gives energetic power to the manipulators and (b) people overcome by fear will agree to anything they believe will protect them from whatever they fear - including the deletion of their freedoms.
The technique that I call Problem-Reaction-Solution where you create a problem and then offer the solution only works because in the middle there is the reaction of fear and anxiety that either demands that 'something must be done' or allows 'solutions' to be introduced that would otherwise be opposed.
Wherever you look, fear is the key to control and so rising above fear must be the key to freedom.
What happened in Boston this week is another example of the manipulation of fear to secure a desired end - the dilution of public opposition to the further expansion of the Orwellian police state.
Whatever the fine detail of what happened it is clear as can be that yet another police/military 'practice drill' was involved that mirrored and covered the actual event ... the same as with 9/11,the London bombings, the Madrid train bombings, the Oslo bombing, Sandy Hook and so on. See the article and pictures later in this newsletter.
The idea is to manipulate fear to manipulate perception. Malcolm X, the American Muslim minister and human rights activist assassinated in 1965, said:
They have already demonised the Islamic world to the extent that many people are instantly suspicious of anyone with a brown face and they are now turning the focus on those who challenge and expose the Orwellian agenda. In both cases fear is once again the front line weapon of choice.
Bombings in public places are designed to glean maximum fear and anxiety from the target population. If something happens in an out-of-the-way location, especially overseas, it does not have the 'this-could-happen-to-me' factor that the purveyors of evil are looking for.
The effect is at arm's length, almost like watching a movie, and not tangible as a potentially personal experience; but choose a school or the finish line of a sporting event and you have the 'me and mine' factor that most powerfully triggers the 'Oh my God, protect me' response.
Psychologist and science journalist Daniel Goleman described an emotional state in his 1996 book, Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, which he dubbed the 'amygdala hijack'. This is when the emotional reaction to a situation is out of all proportion to the perceived threat and the fear response mechanisms overwhelm - hijack - the thinking mind.
The amygdala plays a central role in response and memory related to emotional events and what follows an amygdala hijack is the reaction known as fight or flight which causes people to either attack what they fear or run away from it.
This is also known as the fight-flight-or-freeze response and the latter comes from the animal programs within human genetics that respond to danger by standing frozen-still or playing dead so they either won't be noticed or be left alone.
The three stages of an amygdala hijack are usually described as a strong emotional reaction; sudden onset; and often a realisation that the reaction was not appropriate to the situation - 'I don't know what got into me.'
An amygdala hijack is normally perceived as an instant response to a situation that dies down pretty quickly when the thinking brain or neocortex kicks in and brings a calmer consideration and perception of the circumstances. It is the neocortex that says 'Oh my goodness what was I thinking?' Er, you weren't, that was the problem.
Mark Twain said that a lie can be half way around the world before the truth gets its boots on and that can be the relationship between the thinking mind and the emotions in the midst of an amygdala hijack. One reason for this is that the amygdala is always like the sprinter kneeling in the blocks while the neocortex is sitting with its feet up reading a book - focussed on thinking and not reacting.
Once an emotional starting pistol goes bang the amygdala is off down the track while the neocortex says 'what was that noise?' And what keeps people in that emotionally 'set' position is a constant barrage of perceived potential dangers - 'physical', financial, personal, whatever.
Instead of having a gun in your holster in case of a threat it is permanently in your hand with the trigger cocked and so when a Problem-Reaction-Solution scenario is played out most of the population is already primed because of what I will call a state of 'amygdala standby'.
You can liken this to being in a dark house that is said to be haunted and you jump or freeze when you hear a noise that normally wouldn't bother you. The amygdala standby, using the sprinter analogy, is permanently in a state of 'on your marks', even 'set', because of all the fear stimuli that it has to scan and assess in a world where the most abundant emotions - by design - are anxiety and fear.
When you look at the character traits and responses generated by the amygdala you can immediately appreciate why it is such a target for the Shadow People behind the structure of society and its social engineering. It is pivotal (though not exclusive) in triggering a state of fear and people with a malfunctioning amygdala have been known to have no fear in situations when that would normally be the response.
The amygdala has also been related to anxiety, aggressive behaviour, alcoholism and even sexual orientation. Homosexual men tend to have more female patterns in the amygdala than heterosexual males and the same with homosexual women in terms of male patterns.
The amygdala works in association with the reptilian brain and this combination is at the core of mass manipulation through fear.
The reptilian component is said to be the oldest part of the human brain and relates to repeating and predictable patterns of behaviour (which is why the reptilian hybrids are so obsessed with repeating ritual), reacting without conscious thought (see amygdala) and fear of not surviving in all its forms - physical, financial, personal and so on. You can see how closely the reptilian brain and the amygdala are connected.
This cartoon captures the reptilian brain perfectly ...
The reptilian brain-amygdala combination (I will call it the RBA) is the stadium in which the global conspiracy is played. If the bloodlines and Shadow People don't control this arena then they don't control us, end of story, and this is why society is specifically structured to target both of them all day every day.
As people awaken to awareness beyond body-mind the RBA alliance loses its power - especially when an awareness of our eternal nature sets us free from the fear of death and brings the realisation that this whole 'Earth' deal is only an illusion that we are manipulated to interpret as solid and 'real'.
This self-realisation is happening to ever greater numbers of people and the Control System is working harder than ever before to present us with endless reasons to fear that will return us to RBA domination.
One expression of this process is known as 'future shock' - 'the physical and psychological distress suffered by one who is unable to cope with the rapidity of social and technological changes'; but the shocks are far from only social and technological. They include staged attacks like the one at the Boston marathon.
In fact, it is the Boston-type, 9/11-type shock that activates the Problem-Reaction-Solution which brings about 'the physical and psychological distress suffered by one who is unable to cope with the rapidity of social and technological changes' because the shock is used as the excuse to rapidly change society.
Once again the response is overwhelmingly based on what could happen and not on what is happening. The system only has to sacrifice a relatively few (did happen) to enslave the emotions of the vast majority (could happen).
Three people died and some 170 were injured in the Boston attack but most of the American population of more than 300 million will have had their perceptions of public events and places transformed by the thought of what could happen to them and their families.
For every child killed in a school shooting there are millions of parents who drop off their children at school every morning with a new anxiety to be added to all the others. The 'could happen' mentality is incredibly powerful in locking people into amygdala standby and denying them peace of mind - peace of emotion.
It is also crucial to generating public support, or at least diluting opposition, to new 'security' and 'protection' measures that further advance the Orwellian state. This is not based on calm and considered thought because that is not the field of emotion. Emotions don't think, they react, as in Problem-Reaction-Solution.
The mainstream media is vital to the manipulation of perception through the manipulation of emotion. Here we have the word again - perception. The reality of a situation is not what matters to the social engineers, but the perception of it. The reptilian brain-amygdala doesn't know the difference between reality and perception and because of this social engineering is seriously effective.
The forces that wish to disarm Americans for their own fascistic reasons lost a vote in the Senate this week and now they and their lapdog 'president' are having to rethink how they impose gun laws that are central to the military takeover that is planned at some point.
The gun law campaign has been founded on blatantly-staged mass shootings in locations once deemed safe by the public - places such as schools and universities - in pursuit once again of the 'this could happen to me and my kids' perception of reality.
Yet how likely is it to happen?
A Department of Justice memo leaked to the US National Rifle Association said: 'Assault weapons are not a major contributor to gun crime ... a complete elimination of assault weapons would not have a large impact on gun homicides.' The memo, written by Greg Ridgeway, Deputy Director of the National Institute of Justice, a research, development and evaluation agency of the Department of Justice, also said:
Fatalities from mass shootings (those with 4 or more victims in a particular place and time) account on average for 35 fatalities per year. Policies that address the larger firearm homicide issue will have a far greater impact even if they do not address the particular issues of mass shootings.
So there you have the official figure - 35 fatalities on average a year from mass shootings with four or more victims and even then the major ones like Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, Wisconsin and so on are clearly staged by the military-Intelligence networks to justify ever more gun control.
The number of people killed on the roads of America: one every 13 minutes or 155 a day and many of them are children. Where is the outrage about that compared with the demonising of gun owners? I wish there were no guns at all, but while the US government increasingly arms its police with military weaponry the last thing we need is an unarmed population.
Some 3,000 people were killed in the attacks of 9/11, but hundreds of thousands die every year in America alone because of Big Pharma drugs and medical error. Why don't we have uniforms in place at every hospital and drug store checking for drug reps and doctors? They kill and maim infinitely more people than terrorists, even government ones which comprise nearly all of them.
Yet the manipulation of perception through emotion means that so many accept more imposition on their lives and basic freedoms to protect them from terrorism while racing to the doctor whenever their health takes a dip.
We have a situation in Wales where children and young people have been lining up for the MMR vaccine that many of their parents had previously rejected after Dr Andrew Wakefield published research suggesting a possible link between the triple jab and autism (the figures for which have soared since mass vaccination - see video after this article).
The near-panic to get vaccinated has been caused by a measles outbreak in the city of Swansea and other locations in South Wales and this is being blamed on the lack of immunisation with the MMR because of the 'Wakefield scare'.
They blame Wakefield when they could easily have given the three vaccinations separately and not all at once because it was the combination on which Wakefield's research was based. But they didn't because no doubt there is an adverse effect caused by the three together that is different to when they are spaced apart.
At the time of writing measles cases in the area have passed 800 and while they are pointing the figure at the lack of vaccination the authorities are not telling us how many vaccinated children have succumbed to the disease.
Given that most children are vaccinated the percentage must be high. So why were they not protected? Why did my son Jaymie have no childhood diseases after not being vaccinated while his school friends did? Why do other unvaccinated children I know have the best record at their school for the fewest days off for ill health?
Standing in line to be poisoned in South Wales and have their immune systems assaulted and undermined for life.
But when the starting gun is fired by the propaganda of fear, in this case about the dangers of measles, the reptilian brain/amygdala has no time for rational thought and calm assessment of the claims and evidence. The only word in their collective vocabulary is ...
The controversy and re-evaluation of childhood vaccines in the light of the Wakefield revelations was a potentially massive blow for the vaccine industry and they have been working to put the public back to sleep ever since.
They and the medical authorities viciously targeted Wakefield personally and he was struck off the Medical Register in May 2010 and barred from practicing medicine in the UK. All week the media and the authorities (same thing largely) have been repeating over and over that Wakefield's research has been 'thoroughly discredited', but has it?
Wakefield has for sure in the public mind, but his research? How can anyone trust what mainstream 'science' and 'medicine' says about anything when it is dominated by Big Pharma and Big Biotech? Wakefield was a warning to all potential whistleblowers about what happens when you try to buck the system.
Now we have the scare in Wales and parents who previously rejected the MMR are lining up with their kids. What happened? The system got to the RBA by scaring the pants off them. Marion Lyons, director of health protection for Public Health Wales, said:
'We can't bring this outbreak to an end unless the parents of unvaccinated children either arrange vaccination with their GP, call into one of the weekend drop-in sessions or ensure that if their child attends a school where vaccinations are being offered they have signed a consent form for them to be vaccinated.'
This is utter nonsense. What brings outbreaks to an end are immune systems overpowering the threat and that process is actually undermined by the deluge of chemical toxins that still developing immune systems are swamped with from birth on top of all the other poisons in food and drink.
But don't tell that to the RBA - it simply isn't interested. It just gets in line and rolls up its sleeve. Phew, safe again.
I have been saying for years that the reptilian brain and other fear and survival centres like the amygdala are fundamental to the system of human control via perception control and the more I observe the more obvious this becomes.
It is important to know this because instead of just trying to stay calm in an emotional situation you can focus your mind on the very parts of the brain from where the reactions are being generated. The more specific the focus the more powerful and effective it will be in regaining conscious control of these panic buttons.
It is certainly worth trying next time the RBA kicks in to focus your attention on these central points of emotional neurosis and consciously calm them. There are times that fight or flight can save your life when the response is in sync with the situation that you face, as with the reptilian brain smashing on the brakes or swerving past a truck, but most of the time the emotional panic is way over the top and unnecessary.
Taking control of these reactions, as opposed to the reactions controlling us, can make the difference between living life and life living you.