Sunday, April 14, 2013

The David Icke Newsletter, April 7th, 2013 MUSING ON A CRAZY WORLD ...... WHICH THINKS IT'S SANE

The David Icke Newsletter, April 7th, 2013
MUSING ON A CRAZY WORLD ...


... WHICH THINKS IT'S SANE
Hello all ...


It has been one of those weeks for me when a quote from Jiddu Krishnamurti, the Indian speaker and writer, came to mind many times: 'It is no measure of health to be well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society.'
But that is what I see all the time - people well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society and as the quote in the headline says: Insanity is a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world.
We have had a story running in Britain for the last week or so about a football manager called Paolo Di Canio. He is a former player in this country who went on to manage a lower-league club, Swindon Town. But then he was hired by Sunderland in the Premiership and suddenly what had not been a major problem and hardly ever mentioned became a national story.
Di Canio had made the fascist salute during a match when he played for Lazio in Italy and had described his political views in terms that he was 'a fascist, not a racist' in 2005. He has also said that Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was 'basically a very principled, ethical individual' who was 'deeply misunderstood'.


Now in my world, although I profoundly disagree with him, he has a right to those views so long as he doesn't force them and the consequences on anyone and there is absolutely no evidence of that. They are just his views and he's a football manager, not standing for Parliament or starting a political movement.
The media storm over Di Canio's appointment as manager of Sunderland in the North East of England was triggered by the resignation from the club in protest by non-executive vice-chairman David Miliband, the brother of Ed Miliband, the leader of the opposition Labour Party.
There are very strained relations between brothers David and Ed because David thought that he was a certainty to be elected leader of the Labour Party until Ed joined the contest and won by a short head. Not that he had one; I mean the vote was close.

David Miliband, who has been the Member of Parliament for South Shields where so many are in dire economic straits, had been paid £125,000 for 15 days work by the nearby Sunderland Football Club (supported by the said struggling local people) which he had joined in 2011.This is the equivalent of £42,000 a week or more than £2 million a year and exceeded what top earners actually playing in the team were taking home.
This is shocking alone and given that he has earned a million pounds as an 'advisor' and through the political public speaking circuit since 2010 on top of his considerable parliamentary salary would it have been too much for him, as a leading member of the alleged 'party of the people', to have donated his Sunderland money, or even part of it, to a local food bank feeding his hungry constituents?
David Miliband resigned in protest at the views expressed eight years ago by Di Canio, a football player and manager who has done nothing to put what he believes into political practice. Miliband, the 'man of principle', wanted to make a statement (he is moving to America anyway) that he abhorred fascism - not least as a member of a Jewish Marxist family whose mother lived in mainland Europe during the Nazi era.
Yes, very principled. But wait. Isn't this the same David Miliband, a British Foreign Secretary and former close advisor to Tony Blair, who supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq which killed and maimed for life millions of civilians based on lies?; is this the same man who taped his mouth and sat on his hands in the face of the ever-unfolding genocide against Palestinians by Israel when as Foreign Secretary he could have loudly and continually condemned and exposed what is happening?
It surely is.

The same David Miliband who resigned very publicly in protest at the views some years ago of a football manager who, to my knowledge, has never voted to bomb and slaughter anyone. I may not agree with Di Canio's views, but I know which of the two has done most to put fascism into practice and who therefore is the greater danger to the world.
Miliband will not for a second see this gross hypocrisy because he is well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society. To him, his support for mass murder in faraway countries cannot be equated with fascism and nor can what Israel is doing daily to Palestinians.
His brain is firewalled from such connections, but when someone voices support for an officially-labelled fascist like Mussolini he can thrust his nose in the air in profound indignance. Being well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society means to equate bombing civilian targets with a legitimate action to advance the principles of the 'free world'. Profound sickness becomes their version of normal and rational.
If you are born into a madhouse and you grow up there knowing nothing else then the happenings in the madhouse become your version of normal. Tell someone in this situation that what is happening is madness and they will call you mad. This is how so many perceive world events and their daily lives.
The Miliband firewall is holding nicely as he embarks on his new job in America - one wonders if the Sunderland resignation would have been quite so immediate if he wasn't leaving the country anyway.
Miliband has just announced his resignation as a Member of Parliament to take up a richly-rewarded job - figures of close to half a million dollars a year have been mentioned - as head of the New York-based 'charity', International Rescue Committee (IRC)

This 'charity' ironically wrote to him in 2007 when he was British Foreign Secretary to complain at his government's 'very weak performance' in dealing with the refugee crisis in Iraq. The letter, also signed by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Refugee Council, said:
'We would urge you to work alongside your colleagues in the Home Office and the Department for International Development to push for a much more robust recognition of the UK's obligations to all persecuted Iraqis, both as an active party in Iraq and as a signatory of the 1951 Refugee Convention.'
Now the IRC have hired Miliband at great expense to run their vast worldwide operation. I have been writing charity as 'charity' in respect of International Rescue Committee because when you see the characters involved this, at the very least, is not going to be only a 'charity'.
The IRC board of overseers includes four former US Secretaries of State - Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice - plus former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and Elie Wiesel, the Transylvanian-born Jewish-American writer, professor and political activist. IRC is also supported by corporate giants such as JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Pepsi, Intel and McKinsey and so on.


Rice and Powell ... they care so much.

Well, well. I am so glad that the 'charity' is in the hands of such life-long lovers of peace, fairness, children, the poor and oppressed. Phew. I mean, think if the personnel did not have their values.



Madeleine Albright is one of these campaigners for the right of life and health for all children. It was she who was asked when Secretary of State in the Bill Clinton administration if she felt that the half a million children who had died (more than in Hiroshima) because of her government's sanctions against Iraq were 'worth it'. She replied: '... we think the price is worth it.'
Here are Albright, Kissinger, Powell and Rice who have made decisions costing the lives of tens of millions since the 1970s when Kissinger was Secretary of States to Richard Nixon and they have together devastated the Near and Middle East, South East Asia and a shocking list of the poorest peoples on Earth.
These people are overseers of a global charity supposedly dedicated to helping the world's poor and oppressed? Expressions of evil like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan who have caused death, poverty and misery to untold multitudes by their manipulation of the financial system want to help the poor and needy?
As my mother used to say - 'I am not as green as I am cabbage looking.'


The IRC empire.

IRC operates in 40 countries with 14,000 employees in 270 diplomatic offices and 22 American cities. It boasts of its rapid response to 'humanitarian disasters' with an arrival time of within 72 hours. Having your feet on the ground first can be good for the victims, but also good for those who want to take control of the situation right from the start.
Getting on for half of IRC's funding comes from US government grants, 27 per cent from oversees governments, 11 per cent from the United Nations and the rest from private donations. Its income in 2010 is reported to have been $325,813,000.
IRC is government funded and so an arm of government, has major government representatives and politicians in its ranks, including now David Miliband, and gets to humanitarian disasters within 72 hours while working in countries all over the world. Is it any surprise that researchers have connected this operation to the CIA?
Author Eric Thomas Chester tells in Covert Network: Progressives, the International Rescue Committee, and the CIA how the IRC evolved from a small organisation of committed activists to a global operation functioning as one link in the CIA's covert network. It makes sense of the personnel, that's for sure.
Miliband will arrive in September to head an organisation with 'overseers' who, like himself, supported and/or manipulated invasions of countries like Afghanistan and Iraq which caused the very humanitarian disasters that the IRC says it is dedicated to addressing.
Insanity is a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world.
Talking of which ...

I have had Professor Richard Dawkins from Oxford University on my radar for a long time because of his blanket condemnation of anyone who promotes a version of reality that is different from his own and seeks to trash alternative ways of healing at every opportunity. You can see from the above quote where this chap is coming from.
Mainstream 'science' to Dawkins is the cutting edge of knowledge and so anything that challenges its dogmas must by definition be wrong. I have dubbed him Dogma Dawkins for this reason and he has presented a number of television programmes about what he calls 'pseudo-science' and alternative methods of healing with the goal of making them look silly.
He also struts around condemning religion while not seeing that he is the High Priest of his own religion of Scientism. His god is the mainstream science 'norm' and what is referred to as the 'scientific method' or 'evidence-based science'.
What religions do is ignore any evidence that challenges the belief-foundation of the religion and condemn anyone who does not believe its dogma as misguided, even an infidel or enemy of God.
The Dawkins quote 'you cannot be both sane and well-educated and disbelieve in evolution' is just another version of 'you cannot disbelieve in my version of God and go to heaven and be saved.' But this week another Dawkins quote took my eye and continues the theme of being well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. A review of his book, The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True, said:
'Dawkins believes in absolute reality. He does not believe that reality is malleable. Dawkins admits his understanding of quantum mechanics is foggy and so declines to delve very far into that topic.'
Let me get this straight. An Oxford 'professor' who attacks, ridicules and vilifies those who have a different version of reality to him believes in 'absolute reality' while at the same time saying that his 'understanding of quantum mechanics [which proves that it is not absolute] is foggy' and decline to delve very far into that topic.
You are kidding me. What is that if not pseudo-science? This is how left-brain prisoners sit in their perception cells while believing they are free-thinking and intelligent. How can you be an Oxford University professor and take the chair of Public Understanding of Science from1995 until 2008 and say that your understanding of quantum mechanics is foggy while dogmatically pontificating on the nature of reality?
Extraordinary.

If this were only his view, as with Paolo di Canio, there would not be a problem, but he is teaching young people and the next generation of scientists and he is held up as some sort of expert on what is and is not 'real'.
Dawkins has done tremendous damage over the years for the credibility of alternative almost everything although the tide is now fast turning against him and others of his ilk like Christopher French, Professor of psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. French is also the Editor-in-Chief of The Skeptic magazine in the UK which is the propaganda arm of the concrete mind.
These people have become well-adjusted to a pseudoscientific dogma that excludes even a discipline within its own ranks - quantum mechanics and the study of the sub-atomic world. Their flawed perception of the reality (it has to be flawed by the very definition of not including quantum revelations) is like an addiction to them.
They cannot conceive of anything else and this is what the Skeptic, or Septic, Society is really all about - defending a view of reality that excludes quantum physics. It is the very definition of pseudo-science and what they call the 'scientific method' or 'evidence-based science' is not all the possible evidence, but only that produced within the rigid parameters of what they decide is evidence.
They talk about repetition of (often rigged) results in scientific 'experiments', peer reviews and 'empirical evidence' but fail to see that this has parked them in a cul-de-sac when it comes to understanding reality and has delivered endless horrors upon human society including genetically-modified 'food', thalidomide and a stream of other health-destroying, mind-destroying drugs, vaccines, potions and poisons.

Nothing can be credible without encompassing the quantum realm because that is the information blueprint from which the holographic 'physical' world is projected and so anything that focuses only on the projection - the body as we see it - can only ever treat the symptom not the cause. Do you change a movie on the screen or on the DVD?
This Stone Age 'science' can also wreak mayhem within the body blueprint in the same way that your car engine would be a heap of junk if you gave someone clueless about mechanics a bag of tools and free reign to do what he liked - 'yes doctor, thank-you doctor, anything you say doctor.' This is why, through the 'scientific method', the biggest killer in the United States has become the treatment.
I see this all the time with the scientific (it says here) mainstream. They have to acknowledge that quantum physics exists because it, well, exists; but then they look the other way and crack on as before when without an understanding of the quantum world from which the 'real' world is decoded you cannot understand anything.
It is a form of addiction, but also an expression of fear. They know that if they encompassed quantum reality into specialist areas such as biology on which Dawkins claims to be an expert then everything would have to be re-evaluated and viewed in a completely different context - and people like Dawkins and French would have to admit they are wrong.
They don't want to do that and accept they have been misguided their entire academic careers and so they do what Dawkins does - ignore quantum reality altogether.


'I'll call Dawkins - he'll confirm it.'

This for me is such an extreme and clearly crazy way to explore the mysteries of reality that it becomes a form of insanity in the sense of the scale of self-delusion. It is a type of schizophrenia in that the mind shuts itself away in a compartment of perception to hold the line against information and evidence that would demolish the prevailing belief system.
But they think they are 'well-adjusted' in contrast to those who can see the madness whom they condemn as misguided and crazy. As I said earlier:
If you are born into a madhouse and you grow up there knowing nothing else then the happenings in the madhouse become your version of normal. Tell someone in this situation that what is happening is madness and they will call you mad.
I experienced this theme again this week when I was visited by a well-adjusted 'journalist' from the UK Sunday Times. I have refused to speak with the mainstream print media for many years because once you put one of these people between what you say and how it is reported you are almost certainly wasting your time in terms of accuracy.
I decided however to put my toe in the water again this week to see if anything had changed given what was happening with world events when I was approached by Rupert Murdoch's UK Sunday Times. I wasn't in the least bit optimistic, but I did so out of sheer curiosity and it soon became clear that nothing had changed whatsoever as they despatched a bloke to my home called William Storr.

You may have seen how much evidence that I present in all the books with a number totalling more than 600 pages and 350,000 words. The one I am close to finishing now will be more like 800 pages and 420,000 words with about 800 images. But of course as usual Storr had not bothered to read any of my books before coming to talk to me about them. Incredible but true.
When I challenged him on this point he said: 'But you have written so many'. Er, yes, and ... your point is? The reason I agreed to speak to the Sunday Times is they said they wanted to make it a major article written at length for their magazine, but Storr turns up to 'interview' an author, and one dealing in unique material, without reading a single word of any of his books and then proceeds to pontificate about them.
He demanded that I give him the 'evidence' (scientific method) verbally when my books are compiled from a massive tapestry of interconnected and mutually supporting information which is why they are so long and detailed.
When I did give him examples of sources he just waved them away as not relevant. At one point he stood and shouted at me: 'You have not given me one example of where you get your information from - come on give me one, give me one.'
I had just told him at length the story about Christine Fitzgerald, the long-time friend of Princess Diana, as an example of thousands of separate sources but that was dismissed as irrelevant. He decided that she hadn't literally meant reptiles when she mentioned the word, but you only have to read her direct quotes after this article to see that this is exactly what she meant.
Storr had not read even one of my books, never mind the quote, and so he didn't know what she had said but still felt that he had the right to make an informed judgement. I think they call it 'journalism'.

This was followed by 'you are just taking events that happen and making them fit your theory' while ignoring the rather relevant fact that I had predicted the events that he was talking about long before they actually happened.
He came out with the usual 'but you can't prove by the scientific method that reptilians exist' and I could quite as easily have been talking to Dogma 'my understanding of quantum mechanics is foggy' Dawkins or Christopher French. In terms of mentality I was.
French arrogantly dismissed the evidence in my books on a television programme once and when I asked him if he had read any of them he said 'No'. I asked him how he could then have any idea what I was saying and he replied: 'I read it in the papers'.
Storr tried to turn my views on science against me by pointing out that I had bottles of pills in the kitchen and I must have been taking drugs for my arthritis. I pointed out that I had never taken drugs for the arthritis at any time since it came at the age of 15 and that the bottles of 'pills' were all natural supplements. Silence.
I found him in the kitchen a few minutes later and whether he went there to check the pills I don't know, but he would have found that it was true.
The arrogance of ignorance is always shocking to behold and meeting Storr was a horrible and depressing experience to realise that the mainstream media is still going round and round in circles on the way to disappearing up its own backside amid coming state censorship to delete even the modicum of real journalism that still survives.
My toe was out of the water as fast as it went in terms of talking to the mainstream print media and, unless I know the person to be open-minded and fair, I will never speak to any of them again because it is a waste of my time.

The media in general is a collective version of being well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society and is to a large extent responsible for that sickness. Day after day it reports madness as sanity and lies as truth and sees people like Richard Dawkins as the arbiters of what is and isn't while anyone with another version of reality must be either a charlatan or a fruit cake.
People like William Storr would have believed, and indicated as much at one point, that basically if what I was saying is true then 'scientists' like Dawkins would know about it. Human society is not only profoundly sick, but profoundly stupid and the two are fundamentally connected.
The print media in terms of newspapers and magazines is fast losing circulation to the Internet and part of that is that it operates in a time-warp of irrelevance. People no longer want to be told that all is sane in a world they can increasingly see is madness.
They don't want the William Storrs sitting between what someone says and how Storr and his colleagues choose to report it when they can go straight to the source and make up their own mind, no middleman filter necessary.
Challenging and exposing a profoundly sick society via the systems of the profoundly sick society is always going to be marginally effective at best and I won't be doing so again with the print media unless circumstances and attitudes dramatically change.
The point to take away from all this? It is not you that is mad - it is the world that you live in. Human society is not only profoundly sick but profoundly stuHuman society



These are quotes from my books from Christine Fitzgerald. Christine was a confidant of Princess Diana for nine years and she told me in 1998 that BBC 'entertainer' Jimmy Savile was a paedophile, necrophiliac and a member of the royal family inner circle. All this has since been confirmed amid the revelations about Savile's record-breaking child abuse.
Christine was also one of many who have told me about the royal family being human-reptilian hybrids. This week the Sunday Times reporter, William Storr, explained away what she said about reptiles as being a metaphor and not literal even though he had not read what she said.
This is what Christine told me in 1998. Not talking literally? You have got to laugh, really ...

The Queen Mother ... now that's a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn't died for a long time, they have just metamorphosised. It's sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it's lizard, because it's cold-blooded, it's much easier for them to do Frankenstein shit than it is for us. The different bodies are just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they've got the secret of the micro-currents, it's so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies [holograms]. These are the energies I work with when I'm healing.
They know the vibration of life and because they are cold-blooded, they are reptiles, they have no wish to make the Earth the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that's been done. The Earth's been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials. It's been like a football for so long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope with everything, including the noxious gases.
They're landing all the time and coming up from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about [holographic manipulation]. They can manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put back in another way. The Queen Mother is 'Chief Toad' of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don't know, you know, about the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.

Balmoral [the Queen's castle in Scotland] is a very, very nasty place. That's somewhere they want to dig underground. They will find reptile fossils, it goes back that far. Don't think of people like the Queen Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person which after a while has had to replace their coat. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it's dying, will be immediately up someone else's jacksy [backside]. It's very vampire, worse than vampire. They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck your blood. Fear is their food. They can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from anything. It's like a holographic image.
We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is all an illusion we are living in. That's the secret. You know when the monarchy's fallen, it's not the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated and this is the closest they have come to it ... (because 'the mental power of the people returning') ... But even though these reptilian ones are fuckers, they are sad, pathetic beasts really, while humanity is galloping towards light. They're just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren't going to win. I can't talk about this everywhere because they would just go 'Christine, get a white coat, put it on backwards, get out'. But I want an end to the bullshit.
Yes, clearly metaphorical!

No comments: