Monday, May 27, 2013

The David Icke Newsletter, May 12th, 2013 THE KILLING FIELDS ...... OF THE EVIL EMPIRE

The David Icke Newsletter, May 12th, 2013



Hello all ...

The word is 'desperate'. It has all gone pear-shaped for the Evil Empire in Syria. This is not what the script demanded. By now, President Bashar al-Assad should have gone the way of Colonel Gaddafi and an extremist Empire clone should have come brutally to power.

Instead there is currently a brutal stalemate between the US-UK-NATO-armed and trained 'rebels', many of whom came in from Libya after doing a similar job there, and the Syrian army. Rothschild Israel has sought to move things along this week with bomb attacks on Syria in the hope that the Syrian army can be weakened or to secure a Syrian response that can lead to all-out war.

Israel loves war, death and destruction and the same with those that run the United States and Britain. They are all psychopathic servants of the same Death Cult that hijacked the world a long time ago and is now seeking to complete its mission to impose a global lockdown on human freedom and choice.

The region of most focus has always been the Middle and Near East and the wider landmass known as Eurasia which connects Europe to Asia and China, and Russia to the Middle East. Continue south and you have Africa, another prime target largely because of its resources.

I mentioned last week in the newsletter about the Boston bombing the importance of this vast landmass to Empire ambitions and the connections between American and British government agencies and terrorist groups in southern Russia and the Caucasus on or close to the Caspian Sea with all its oil and gas reserves.

Long time Death Cult insider Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National Security Advisor to President Carter, emphasised the need to subjugate Eurasia in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard. What he said explains so clearly the unfolding events in the Middle and Near East since the invasion of Afghanistan after 9/11:

Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power ... it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book ...
... In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania (Australia) geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent ...
... About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources ...
... The momentum of Asia's economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea.
General Wesley Clark, NATO's former Supreme Allied Commander Europe, said in a television interview in 2007 that in the immediate wake of 9/11 he was told by Pentagon official that 'they' were going to invade seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then followed by Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

Clark said that he was bewildered by what he was told and he was either lying about his surprise or, most likely, he was well out of the loop or inner circle of the Death Cult even at his exalted level within the military. I have stressed over the years how compartmentalised the real agenda is even for those who would appear to be 'in the know'.
People are given different reasons to take or support actions that serve the overall agenda while having no idea that there is an overall agenda. Military leaders wage war against countries on the pretext of 'fighting terrorism' or 'protecting civilians from tyranny' while often having no clue whatsoever how they are being used.
If we take Clark at his word about not knowing the reason for the wish list of countries to invade after 9/11 we have a perfect example of a general who was NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe who doesn't know that there is a globally-coordinated plan for a fascist takeover that crucially requires to own and control the Middle and Near East if it is to succeed.

If you put Brzezinski's views on Eurasia together with (a) what Clark said that he was told in 2001 and (b) the attacks and invasions in the Middle and Near East since 9/11 it all makes perfect sense simply by looking at this map.
First Afghanistan was invaded on the pretext of 'getting Bin Laden'; then came Iraq because Saddam Hussein had 'weapons of mass destruction' (he didn't); this was followed by the engineered 'Arab Spring' that changed regimes in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya thanks, in the latter case, to NATO bombing and NATO-trained and armed mercenaries on the ground; the Syrian regime of President Assad was next in their sights and it was supposed to go the same way as Libya, but so far it hasn't.
This is why the Death Cult is so desperate to find an excuse to remove Assad and put an extremist Islamic government in place. Note how most of the leaders they have toppled, and in Assad's case wish to topple, have been, for all their faults, secular regimes and not extreme Islamic.
But the various 'rebels' are Islamic extremists dominated by the US-created 'Al-Qaeda' that fought Gaddafi in Libya and now confronts Assad in Syria. Egypt's 'revolution' has left the fascist Egyptian military in control along with President Mohamed Morsi, a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, an American-Israeli front organisation whose motto is 'Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.'
The Brotherhood wants to introduce Islamic Sharia law as 'the basis for controlling the affairs of state and society'. Some spokesmen have said that they now encompass 'democracy', freedom of the press, freedom of criticism and thought, freedom of peaceful demonstrations and freedom of assembly. Only the naïve would believe that this is genuine once they are in power.

'Brother' Morsi gave himself sweeping new powers once in the presidency to the extent that he was described as acting like 'a new pharaoh' and the Muslim Brotherhood is heavily involved in the war against Assad in Syria. I won't call it a 'civil war' because the instigators and leaders are largely mercenaries from outside the country.
It is ironic beyond belief that the Brotherhood states as one of its principle aims to 'unify Islamic countries and states, mainly among the Arab states, and liberating them from foreign imperialism' when it is the product of precisely such 'foreign imperialism'.
I explain in Remember Who You Are how Britain and America established the Muslim Brotherhood after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1924 and they are still controlled by them today. The Brotherhood has also served the interests of the Nazis, Israelis, Russians, French and Germans when it suited them.
Israel is now among the major sponsors of the Muslim Brotherhood. Robert Dreyfuss, author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, wrote: '... beginning in 1967 through the late 1980s, Israel helped the Muslim Brotherhood establish itself in the occupied territories' and it went on to establish Hamas to be Palestinian 'opposition' that the Israelis could control and exploit.
The background to what is happening in the Middle East is a minefield of interconnected forces, many of which appear to oppose each other when in fact they are answering to the same masters.

Brzezinski said in his 1997 book that 'the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being'. The 'economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts', he wrote.
In other words, people in general don't want war, death and destruction and so they have to be manipulated to accept it as a necessary evil in their own perceived interests. Or, as the cold, callous and heartless Brzezinski put it:
Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.
His words mirrored in theme those of the Rothschild Zionist created and controlled Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which included Bush Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney, both vehement supporters of Israel.
It called in 2000 for American forces to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars' against countries including Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran and North Korea, and called for the imposition of regime change in China (World War III). Once again, and echoing the words of Brzezinski three years earlier, the PNAC wrote ...
... [This] process of transformation ... is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor
Four years before and one year before the attacks, Brzezinski and the Project for the New American Century were talking about the same thing ... 9/11.

This was the catalyst for all that has followed both in terms of overseas wars and invasions and the domestic demolition of basic rights and freedoms. What is happening in Syria today is the continuation of the plan that was instigated on September 11th, 2001.
Given this vital role of 9/11 in all that has followed, and given the warning by Brzezinski and the Project for the New American Century that none of it was likely to happen without a perceived external threat like a 'new Pearl Harbor', is there anyone with even a modicum of brain-cell activity who can't see that 9/11 was staged by the very forces that would use it as the excuse to begin to tick-off the countries on their must-have list?
Yet the mainstream media, mainstream academia and much of the global population continues to be in child-like denial of the patently bloody obvious.
Behind all this are the Death Cult networks of families like the Rothschilds which owns Israel, the United States, Canada, Britain and the European Union, Australia etc., etc. Rothschild-controlled countries are working as one unit to advance the plan for the Middle and Near East and Eurasia in general. This includes the removal of Assad in Syria and the takeover of Lebanon, Jordan and the biggest prize of all from their point of view, Iran.
The stalemate in Syria has stalled the process with the war now going on since the spring of 2011 and an estimated 70,000 people have been killed so far. I don't call it the Death Cult for nothing. The Assad regime, far from falling quickly as the Cult anticipated, is not only still in place but currently winning back ground taken by the laughably-named Free Syrian Army (FSA).
The leading 'rebel' group fighting the Assad regime in Syria is Al Nusra, an 'Al-Qaeda' offshoot to which nearly 30 US/NATO-supported 'rebel' groups in Syria have pledged allegiance. The Death Cult created 'Al-Qaeda' and it fights its offspring where it suits and arms and funds it where it suits.

The frustration at the plan being delayed in Syria is causing Death Cult assets like British Prime Minister David Cameron and his little boy Foreign Secretary, William Hague, to press for the open supply of weapons and military support to the US-UK-NATO-controlled Free Syrian Army to replace the present and more limited covert supply through Western poodles like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
They say that lifting an arms embargo against insurgents in Syria will make the Syrian government negotiate a political solution. This is a barefaced lie because Assad has offered such negotiations, but they are always rejected by the US and Britain because the goal is not peaceful negotiation but bloody overthrow.
Rothschild Zionist Cameron is pressing the EU countries to either lift the official embargo immediately or remove the 'non-lethal' restriction from the list of goods currently allowed to be shipped to the Syrian 'rebel' terrorists. They have support of course from Rothschild France which despatched its military to occupy resource-rich Mali.
The Death Cult is desperate to invade Syria and speed the demise of Assad but their propaganda campaign to paint the Assad regime as the baddies and the 'rebels' as the goodies is being torn to shreds by the reports of horrific atrocities by the rebels against Syrian civilians. No doubt there have been atrocities by both sides - that is the nature of war - but the point is that it is both sides with the rebels appearing to be the most ruthless.
This is making the case harder and harder to make to officially give military support to groups with allegiance to Al-Qaeda who are slaughtering civilians every bit as much, and more, than the regime they are seeking to demonise.

Another desperate effort to trigger NATO action against Syria came when Obama announced that his 'red line' would be crossed if the Assad regime used chemical weapons and military intervention would have to be considered if that happened. The ludicrous French president Francois Hollande followed suit. He agreed that the use of chemical weapons would be 'a legitimate reason for direct intervention' and Israel naturally said something similar - any excuse for a war.
You just knew that eventually the claim would be made that Assad had used chemical weapons against civilians because these people are nothing if not predictable.
The claim based on 'evidence' supplied by, yes, Britain and France, was duly made in the hope of justifying what they are aching to do; but then came an interview with Carla del Ponte, a member of a UN panel investigating in Syria, in which she said there were 'strong, concrete suspicions' that the Syrian rebels had used sarin nerve gas.
'This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities', she told Swiss-Italian TV.
White House spokesman (propagandist) Jay Carney said they were 'highly sceptical of any suggestions that the opposition used chemical weapons' and they believed that Assad was responsible. Well, of course, that would be their line, but they couldn't throw the - literal - killer punch that would allow them to say that their red line had been crossed. You can be sure they will be trying again once the dust has settled on this thwarted effort.
There is gathering evidence to support Carla del Ponte's contention that the NATO-backed mercenary 'rebels' in Syria do have chemical weapons. The London Daily Mail ran a story in January 2013 about leaked emails that confirmed plans for a chemical attack in Syria sanctioned by Washington that would be blamed on President Assad to justify a 'humanitarian' invasion of the country.
The report was quickly removed from the Mail website, but you can see a captured image of the posting here. The report revealed details of allegedly hacked emails from the British and Dubai-based defence contractor Britam Defence revealing a plan 'approved by Washington' and organised through the American client state of Qatar to transport a chemical weapon (CW) to Syria that was clearly intended to be a Problem-Reaction-Solution to remove the Assad regime as they have been trying to do for so long.
The emails were revealed by a German hacker and were alleged to be correspondence between David Goulding, the Britam Defence Business Development Director, and Philip Doughty, the company's founder. This was the exchange:
We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
Kind regards

Why would 'the Qataris', in other words US puppet Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the conduit for funding and arming the 'rebels' in Syria and Libya, want to pay enormous sums for a chemical weapon to be delivered to Homs in Syria, one of the centres of 'rebel' operations? There can be only one reason when it was obviously not for the Assad regime and note how the brief was to produce a weapon 'similar to those that Assad should have'.
Britam admitted that its computer system had been hacked but denied that the emails were genuine. I don't believe them. An alleged software systems administrator who said he had checked the technical details of how the Britam email was routed said: 'I have to admit that the email does indeed look genuine ... all these facts check out. So with Mythbusters objectivity I have to call this one plausible.'
Other leaked documents included what was described as 'extremely personal information' and details of some Britam employees that appeared to show they were mercenaries. A CNN report in December 2012 also revealed how the Pentagon was training Syrian rebels in the use of chemical weapons. It said:
The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources. Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials.
The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American.
Another point: why would Assad even think of using chemical weapons when he knows that it would give his global enemies just the excuse they want to destroy him? He would be crazy - and he isn't.

Syrian 'rebels' working with the US and NATO to overthrow Assad.
This week, in another frantic attempt to retrieve their timeline, we had the bombing of Syria by Israel. This was reported as a unilateral attack by the psychopaths of Tel Aviv, but it would have been sanctioned behind the scenes by the usual suspects - the US, Britain, Canada and NATO in general. Obama confirmed as much after the attacks when he said that the US 'coordinates closely' with Israel.
Israeli planes bombed locations around the Syrian capital Damascus in their second attack in three days and claimed to have destroyed stockpiles of Iranian-made guided missiles intended for the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. They produced no evidence of this and Lebanon is another target on the must-have list.

Damascus during the Israeli bombing. The people of that city have not suffered enough have they?
The political prostitutes can't find a microphone quick enough to condemn military action by their target countries, but with Israel there is always silence or the usual 'Israel has the right to defend itself'. This garbage was delivered as always by White House spokesmen, British Foreign Secretary Hague and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, who gave his support for the Israeli airstrikes on Syria while wearing an Israel flag on a lapel badge.
As Michael Chossudovsky from the Center for Research on Globalization said:
There was absolutely no word of condemnation uttered by the United Nations Security Council [or] Secretary General of the United Nations against Israel's attack on Syria and neither has there been a position taken by the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.
Hey, we are talking about Israel with a population of less than eight million - it does what it likes. Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad said the attack was a declaration of war by Israel and Russian president Vladimir Putin has been quoted as warning Israel that Russia would not tolerate further attacks on Damascus and would respond.
The Death Cult plan has always been to trigger World War III with a conflict pitching the US and NATO against Russia and China - regime change in China was included in the demands of the Project for the New American Century. The same forces behind the conflict in Syria are also undermining Russia in the Caucasus.

What is happening today has been planned in detail for decades and in theme for centuries by those on the deep inside that connect with entities beyond our conscious reality. Look at how Iran has been systematically surrounded preparing for the kill and Russia knows that it is in their sights also once Iran is out of the way.
The United States government gives billions in taxpayers' money and debt to Israel every year for military and other spending, but it added more than £200 million even to that to fund a rich country like Israel to build the so-called Iron Dome air defence system designed to intercept short-range rockets and shells with plans to expand its capability to much longer distances.
The timing of the installation of the Iron Dome is no coincidence. It is preparing to defend Israel from what they know is planned to come. Those using Israel to advance a global agenda could not care less about the consequences for the general Jewish population. They are only pawns like everyone else and they live in a state of perpetual fear when they could be living in peace with Palestinians on the basis of equality of treatment and mutual respect.
No-one, not even those who believe they are on the right 'side', can avoid the consequences of living on the same planet as the Evil Empire.

No comments: