Monday, March 04, 2013

The David Icke Newsletter, February 24th, 2013 - THE REAL REASON ....... FOR GUN CONTROL

Copyright David Icke, 2013. All Rights Reserved.
(Note: This newsletter, along with other videos and newsletters going back to 2005, is available to view on www.davidicke.com by logging in using the right-hand menu)
The David Icke Newsletter, February 24th, 2013
THE REAL REASON ...

.... FOR GUN CONTROL
Hello all ...
Before I start: I don't have guns; I don't want guns; I can't remember ever shooting a gun except to win a coconut at the fair; there is nothing about guns that I like and I wish we had a world without them.
To say the least I am not your typical opponent of new gun legislation in America. I don't quote the US Constitution in support of what I say and have no desire to open carry, concealed carry or carry at all.
BUT.
If we are going to be mature and streetwise about current events the most relevant question that needs to be asked is not about guns or no guns, gun laws or no guns laws, but this: why do those who control the American government want to disarm Americans now of the very weapons that would be in any way effective in resisting a military coup by the fascist-controlled American government?
And another: why at the same time that this is happening is state of the art weaponry and technology, including tanks, being transferred in vast quantities by the Pentagon from the military to the American police? And another: why is Homeland Security buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition to be used within the United States?
All this in the very period that the hysteria has been engineered and generated to remove from Americans weapons with any chance of resisting a police/military takeover by their own government which has long been planned and detailed in my books.
Answer those questions (and all they have the same answer) and you will be home and dry in terms of understanding what we are looking at here. I and others have been warning about this for a long time and it is the unfolding of a plan going back many decades (and centuries for the inner circle) to disarm Americans and then unleash the crazies in uniform on a helpless population.

The Problem-Reaction-Solution scenarios of mass shootings followed by demands for new gun laws has a considerable history and to anyone with a mind of their own a blatantly obvious goal - to disarm America. The names are etched in the psyche of Americans and the wider world ... Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Wisconsin, Sandy Hook ... and more.
They all follow a familiar pattern of mostly young people embarking on mass killing sprees in places where the public would normally feel safe - schools, a university, church and movie theatre. The idea is to implant a feeling of 'this could happen to me' or 'this could happen to my kids'.
The mind manipulation demands that people do not feel safe and the best way to achieve this is by targeting locations where they normally would - so increasing the belief in 'this could happen to me' and 'nowhere is safe anymore.' The whole game is the manipulation of fear.
Schools are the main target to play on the natural empathy that people have with children and the relationship that parents have with their own children. How many parents across America took their kids to school in the days after Sandy Hook with a knot in their stomach and a fear that the same could happen to them?
People need to understand that the conspiracy is about the manipulation of perception because everything comes from that. What we believe we perceive and what we perceive we experience - even if what we believe is not true which most of the time it isn't.
The brain is receiving something like eleven million 'impressions' of reality every second and yet constructs what we think we are seeing from just 40 of them. The aim of the conspiracy is to manipulate human perception processes so that we decode and bring into apparent reality the 40 impressions a second that draw us into the trap.

I am not going into detail about Sandy Hook for a simple reason. Of all these staged mass shootings this one is by far the most bizarre and there is so much to research and uncover which is going to take some time yet even for those doing nothing but focus on that.
The usual glaring contradictions and multiple holes in the official story that you get with all these events have been joined with regard to Sandy Hook by the truly surreal. We have had a 'bereaved parent' laughing and joking before moving across to the camera, hyperventilating to simulate emotion, and then delivering his comments.
We have had other interviews with parents in which there was the same strange absence of genuine emotion and a bloke claiming to be a witness who was captured practicing his lines and clearly simulating emotion before speaking to the media.
We have no verifiable evidence that the alleged shooter, a young guy called Adam Lanza, even existed in the last few years let alone that he was the masked gunman. Everything has come from the authorities and independent researchers have established again and again that none of it checks out.
The whole event has been like some sci-fi movie and a lot of research is being done - and needs to be done - to uncover what I am sure will be the staggering scale of deceit involved with Sandy Hook.
I will instead use the shooting at the movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado, as the main example of how these covert 'grab-their-guns' operations follow a clearly identifiable blueprint that the mainstream media refuse in their ignorance (mostly) and conscious connivance (the few) to highlight and expose.

The common themes of psychiatry/psychology/mind control; the military; drugs; official stories that make no sense and contradict the accounts of witnesses; inexplicable coincidences; and Satanic and occult ritual were there in abundance again in Colorado on the opening night of the Batman movie Dark Knight Rises on July 20th 2012.
Twelve people died and 58 were wounded that night when a man dressed in black and wearing a gas mask came in through an emergency exit that could only be opened from the inside, threw a tear gas canister and opened fire.
The alleged 'Batman' killer, 24-year-old James Holmes, was a neuroscience PhD student at Colorado University who had a fascination with altered states of consciousness. Video footage has been uncovered of his presentation at Miramar College in San Diego in which he talked about 'temporal illusions' which he defined as 'an illusion that allows you to change the past'.
The man was classic mind-control material and a number of observers before and after the shootings have described how his eyes fluttered wildly and he repeatedly blinked. His legal team said that he was mentally ill and asked the judge for more time to assess the nature of his illness. The key question is why he is mentally ill.
Holmes, who is said to have called himself 'The Joker', was also reported to be hooked on the prescription painkiller Vicodin (also known as Hydrocodone and Oxycotin), the potential effects of which include 'altered mental states' and 'unusual thoughts or behavior'. Hydrocodone and Oxycotin were among a cocktail of drugs that killed actor Heath Ledger who played 'The Joker' in a previous Batman movie.
For sure, something transformed Holmes' personality from the quiet, brilliant student of before into the drugged-up, messed-up, drop-out with the brightly-dyed orange hair and faraway eyes who claims to remember nothing about the shooting. I believe him.

Then there was the shooting itself. As with all staged massacres, the official story and witness accounts are seriously at odds. Firstly, Holmes was supposed to have entered through a fire escape door that can only be opened from the inside.
At best this was ridiculously bad planning if the official baloney was true, but as usual in these cases he had an amazing piece of 'luck'. A witness described how he saw a man with a goatee beard in the front row take a call on his cellphone and then walk to the fire escape door, push it open, and hold it ajar with his foot. Witness Corbin Dates told CNN:
I was sitting in the second row, probably four seats away from the right aisle where people usually enter from. Another guy walked in after me, sat in front of me in the front row ... and I noticed he got a phone call. Most people when they get phone calls would take it out into the lobby, but this person went directly to the emergency exit.
And on the phone this entire time he was propping the door open with his foot, and it was like he was directing someone to come forward ... 15-20 minutes into the film that's the emergency door that swung right open and a man, 5-8, 5-9, walked in wearing all black, [with tactical clothing and heavy body armour] and he was wearing a gas mask and threw a canister into the audience behind me.
Witnesses also reported that more than one gunman was involved and that tear gas explosions happened on both sides of the theatre. One said: 'From what we saw he wasn't alone. He had someone with him because the second tear gas didn't come from his side.'
Other witnesses said that the police told them they thought there was more than one killer. Officers on the police communication system reported a suspect in a blue shirt and another said that witnesses were giving him conflicting descriptions of the gunman.

Holmes did not act alone and did he even act at all? How would anyone know when the gunman was wearing a mask - just as 'Adam Lanza' did at Sandy Hook? From my own reading of the evidence Holmes did not do any shooting but was outside in the parking lot in a drugged and bewildered state so he could be arrested once the professionals had done their deed.
Holmes was a top-of-the-class student with a highly successful academic career before he moved to Colorado University the year before the shooting. Friends and acquaintances before Colorado said that the media portrayal of him as a loner was very inaccurate.
He was described as a humorous man who got on with everybody and a recommendation by the University of California at Riverside described him as 'a very effective group leader' who 'takes an active role in his education, and brings a great amount of intellectual and emotional maturity into the classroom.'
Things suddenly began to rapidly deteriorate when he arrived in Colorado and he was apparently treated by Dr Lynne Fenton, a psychiatrist at Colorado University, who is said to specialise in schizophrenia and 'threat assessment'.
Fenton is the medical director of Student Mental Health Services and her online resume says that she sees up to 15 students a week for medication and psychopathy and others in her private practice as a psychiatrist. She was also formerly head of physical medicine with the US Air Force in San Antonio, Texas.

James Holmes, who could not even say his name on his first court appearance, was a patient of Dr Lynne Fenton.
Holmes was one of only six students every year accepted into an elite neuroscience programme, a National Institutes of Health training course at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Denver. He was awarded an annual grant of more than $20,000 for his studies and turned down a higher grant and free studies at the University of Illinois to go there.
His area of research was all to do with the mind, the illusion of time, and how the mind could have its sense of reality manipulated. Ironically, it would strongly appear that exactly this happened to him after he arrived in Colorado which, as I have detailed in my books, is one of the epicentres of mind control and Satanism in the United States.
Holmes is said to have given himself up to police without a fight in the theatre car park despite being supposedly heavily armed and killing all those people. He is claimed to have booby-trapped his apartment with such skill and sophistication that it took the FBI two days to make it safe. A spokesman said 'the intricacy of these bombs is something rarely seen outside a war zone'.
Where did Holmes get the knowledge to do that with no record of such activity or experience? Police claimed that Holmes had set the booby traps to kill anyone who went there, but it was Holmes who told the police that it was dangerous to go to his home and why. None of the official story makes any sense because as usual it is a pack of lies.

A drug that has been highlighted for possible use on Holmes is Scopolamine, also known as 'The Devil's Breath'. It can be added to drinks and food without detection because it has no colour, taste or smell. Scopolamine makes people so docile and pliable that they will do anything for you, even empty their own bank accounts and hand you the money while appearing to be function perfectly normally to any onlooker.
A drug dealer said of Scopolamine: 'You own that person ... it's like they are a child.'
The drug also has the added 'bonus' of blocking memories even under hypnosis and would mean that Holmes would have no idea what happened to him. Holmes was held at the Arapahoe County Detention Center where an employee is quoted as saying: 'He claims he doesn't know why he's in jail. He asked: "Why am I here?"
Sirhan Sirhan then and now ... and the man is not guilty.

Sirhan Sirhan, the alleged killer of Bobby Kennedy in 1968 who has been in jail ever since, says that he has no recollection to this day of killing Kennedy. I have laid out the background in ... And The Truth Shall Set You Free for how the assassination was the work of a security guard called Thane Eugene Cesar and Sirhan was just the mind-controlled fall guy in the right place at the right time, or, for him, the other way round. This would explain why 13 shots were fired while Sirhan's gun could only hold eight.
We see a similar story in the mass shooting at the Sikh Temple in Wisconsin in 2012. US mind-control programmes are run by the military and one of the major centres is Fort Bragg, North Carolina. It just so happens that the man blamed for the gun attack on the Sikh temple on August 5th was 40-year-old Wade Michael Page who was formerly a 'psychological operations specialist' at ... Fort Bragg.

Six people were killed at the temple before Page allegedly shot himself in the head (so many 'lone nut' gunmen kill themselves either in truth or by the guns of 'law' enforcement). Once again it was sold as a 'lone nut' shooting when witnesses have spoken of multiple gunmen acting in unison. The London Guardian reported:
One of the wounded men said that an unknown number of gunmen walked into the kitchen of the Sikh Temple and opened fire. The man who said his father had been wounded reported that there had been multiple gunmen. Those who had been inside the building at the time of the attack described it as a very coordinated thing.
Another eyewitness told the Associated Press: 'Between ten and ten-thirty, four white males who were dressed darkly, dressed in all black clothing [as in Colorado and Sandy Hook], came in and opened fire on our congregation.' This could have been confirmed by a surveillance camera inside the temple - but it was turned off at the time.
This is still another common theme as we saw in the Oklahoma bombing, 9/11, the London bombings, the assassination of Princess Diana, the cold-blooded murder by British police of a Brazilian electrician after he was wrongly identified as a terrorist, and in Aurora and Sandy Hook. Where is the surveillance camera footage from the theatre and the school that would show us exactly what happened?
Despite what the Sikh witnesses said about multiple gunman the official story was repeated so many times right across the media that it soon became the version that people believe unless they are aware enough to question what they are told.

Obama doing make-believe after Sandy Hook: simulated tears from a simulated man.
You can tell what the 'solution' is planned to be in a Problem-Reaction-Solution scenario by the speed and coordination with which a clear and dominant theme appears immediately after they happen. With 9/11 it was Osama bin Laden and with mass shootings it is the need for more gun control.
What is never stated is that Chicago's stricter gun control laws have caused violent crime to soar and the same in Australia because while not even nearly everyone is armed in the United States the criminals can't be sure when they invade a home or business which are and which aren't.
Once people are unable to own guns legally the criminals are suddenly far more confident that you will be helpless when they turn up with weapons that they and terrorists never have a problem securing no matter what the gun laws say. They are criminals and terrorists after all.

The Australian experience.

The Rothschild Zionist lobby led by Senator Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein were delivered by catapult to the nearest microphone and we were off with Obama in tow wiping away fake tears that would make even the worst B-movie actor look like Marlon Brando.
These are the same crowd crying 'we must protect the children' in the wake of Sandy Hook who so enthusiastically support the cold-blooded murder of children galore across Africa and the Middle and Near East in drone attacks sanctioned by the signature of President Fraud.
Feinstein pulled a new gun control bill from her filing cabinet - in the section marked 'waiting for an opportunity' - and the media went to work campaigning for more gun controls through personifications of truth and intelligence like CIA intern Anderson Cooper and the clueless Piers Morgan at CNN.
Morgan's role was to demonise those challenging gun control because they know where it is leading while Cooper was deployed to demonise those questioning the official fairy tale of Sandy Hook - the job that Cooper and Morgan should be doing if they were real journalists, but are patently not.
There was no debate, no rational consideration of the issues, just the black and whiteness of textbook propaganda: guns are bad, what the government says happened did happen and anyone who says otherwise is obviously a terrorist, a hater of children or a conspiracy nut that cares nothing for the feelings of the bereaved.

Feinstein's assignment for decades has been to produce the legislation to disarm Americans and yet she continues to be protected by armed guards and Obama has signed into the law the right of presidents and their spouses to have armed protection for the rest of their lives.
And that's the point of all this. Weapons are being taken away from the people, but not from the state and the agents of the state. In fact, the state has never been armed in all history like it is today and this is becoming more extreme by the week.
Laws that prevent the military being used in domestic law enforcement are being overcome by turning the police into the military. They now wear the same type of uniforms and protection gear and they are increasingly being armed in the same way.
There is a Pentagon operation in the United States called the 1033 program which is handing over military hardware and weapons worth hundreds of millions of dollars every year for use by the police. The figure of $212 million in 2010 doubled to $500 million in 2011 and is planned to go on increasing at an exponential rate.
Orders for 2012 revealed another increase of 400 per cent on 2011, according to data provided to the Internet news site, The Daily, by the Pentagon's Defense Logistics Agency.

The transfers include grenade launchers, M-16 assault rifles, armoured vehicles and tanks, helicopters and military robots. The official cover story is that this is necessary to help police 'fight drugs and terrorism' (both of which are controlled by the very same networks that are arranging for the transfer of military equipment to the police - Problem-Reaction-Solution).
The US Department of Homeland Security has recently sought to purchase 7,000 fully-automatic assault weapons to be used domestically while seeking to remove such weapons from the population. President Fraud said that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not criminals, and on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities. Unless, of course, they are in the hands of state agencies.
This is nothing whatsoever to do with drugs or terrorism and everything to do with building a centrally-controlled, centrally-armed military and police infrastructure to enforce total human enslavement under the plan known as Agenda 21.
The transfer of military armoury to the police has been happening for decades, but it is now going into overdrive. More than 17,000 civilian agencies have received military equipment worth some $2.6 billion so far and they often pay only for the cost of delivery, The Daily reported.
Civilian law enforcement is being equipped with military technology by using the absolutely colossal military 'defence' (attack) budget to build a civilian military operation called the police, SWAT teams, FBI, Transport Security Administration (TSA), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a long list of others.
The Obama administration was caught supplying weapons to Mexican drug cartels to further justify gun laws when they were used in robberies and shootings across the border in states like Arizona. The weapons were supplied through the ATF in covert operations called Project Gunrunner, Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver.

Obama said during his spurious election campaign in 2008:
We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.
He knew exactly what he was talking about - the control system of Agenda 21 - and we are now so clearly seeing it happening. The Cabal-owned MSNBC network posted an article in effect justifying the deployment to police forces of 'a 10-officer 16,000-pound armored tank that takes bullets like Superman and drives 80 mph'.
This BearCat G3 is needed to protect the police, apparently, and MSNBC reported that 'the federal government buys dozens each year for local police departments.' The fascist Gestapo known as 'SWAT teams' (people are just flies) are the major recipients it seems with their shocking record of targeting the wrong houses and killing innocent people including children.

These are the El-lite of goonatics and their armed raids on homes and businesses are absolutely soaring every year. And, hey, great news from MSNBC - 'Thanks to the US government, most police departments now get their BearCats free'. Wow, great stuff. Ever thought of asking the real reason why? Ooops, sorry, I'm being silly now.

Lou Vallejo, sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado, said: 'In the world of law enforcement, we must also be prepared for the highly unlikely, but possible tragic event ... and there is no price tag you can put on the life of a police officer who is out there protecting you.'
And how can you argue with that?, the MSNBC article said. Well, I'll give it a try for a start because it's bollocks. This is not about protecting police officers who are seen as fodder for the system like everyone else. The game is mass human subjugation.
Notice that this military weaponry including tanks is being given even to small county police forces in line with the local enforcement plans of Agenda 21. Local city, town and county authorities are becoming tyrannies already, but the plan is to integrate them with the police, military and other government agencies into a seamless system of total control. This is an Agenda 21 buzz-word: integration.
Police budgets are being run down in an attempt to force them into using methods that they would not normally employ if they had the man power. Bill Partridge, chief of Police in Oxford, Alabama, said that his use of the 1033 program was to 'save money, bottom line'.
He said that his department does a weekly or daily check to see what is available from the military. 'If you're quick on the trigger on the Internet, usually you can get what you want', he said.
If people think that local police going around in tanks is over-the-top well try unmanned armed drones patrolling the skies of America (and the rest of the world eventually) with the technology to see through the walls of your home.

You can also see that the same turn-the-police-into-the-military process has been long underway in the UK. I am old enough to remember when British police did not have guns and yet now it is almost commonplace. In terms of Tasers, it is.
It was announced by the British Ministry of defence in 2012 that contracts are being signed for 30,000 assault rifles used by troops to be deployed for use by civilian police officers. Why? Er, fighting terrorists and criminal gangs.
Why is the Ministry of Defence responsible for the military getting involved in arming the police, a domestic and civilian agency? The answer is obvious for those who are not consumed by a life-time of perception programming.

It is an old and familiar story of disarming the population with gun laws and then triggering an armed coup on the population. Jews, for example, were banned from 'acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons' before they were rounded up by heavily armed fascists and taken to the concentration camps.
Most people are ignorant of what is going on and others are so naïve they cannot conceive that their own government would do this to them. Gun control propagandist Piers Morgan ticks both boxes of what you might call the clueless and incredulous, and so he does his job like a good little boy while believing that he sits on some moral high ground.
Tyranny is the norm in human affairs since this reality was hijacked by a hidden force of cold, callous and demented evil and we need to face that, break out of the bubble and clear our eyes, or take the consequences of terminal ignorance and naivety.




No comments: